Hi all,
I have implemented max-sum/sum-product in c++ before and a while ago,
did the same in Haskell.
I don't think my implementation is as idiomatic Haskellish as I would
like, and I have so far not
published it and also not looked at it for a little while (since I
have some more projects :) ).
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 15:30:09 +1200
From: Richard O'Keefe o...@cs.otago.ac.nz
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Can Haskell outperform C++?
To: Roman Werpachowski roman.werpachow...@gmail.com
Cc: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
Message-ID: b43b8ce3-9f90-4dc3-8725-d62298397...@cs.otago.ac.nz
I have a related-seeming question:
Say I have a type class with methods, and some functions implemented
on top of it. The class methods are inherently unsafe. Instances of
the class are supposed to satisfy some conditions, and if those
conditions are met, the functions built on top are safe.
So
Hello Haskellers!
Did you see Ambassador Peyton Jones in Scala land? Simon was recently at
ScalaDays 2012 (a large gathering for professional Scala users) giving a
[keynote talk on Cloud Haskell][v1] (one hour video). Cloud Haskell is
a pretty exciting new development in the Haskell space,
plugins-auto has a demo in the darcs repo:
http://www.patch-tag.com/r/facundo/plugins-auto/snapshot/current/content/pretty/demo
Does that work for you ?
- jeremy
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Андрей Янкин yankin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm newbie and I've got a problem.
I'm trying to
I tried this and all other examples I could find.
They didn't work. I hadn't find any explanation yet.
And I don't know how I can get more information about errors.
I believe Plugins uses GHC API internally.
Нowever code like [1] works well for me on Linux and Windows.
I think I'll stay with this
- Original Message -
From: Richard O'Keefe o...@cs.otago.ac.nz
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Can Haskell outperform C++?
-snip-
The claim was and remains solely that
THE TIME DIFFERENCE BETWEEN *ALGORITHMS*
can be bigger than
THE TIME
There was and is no claim that method 2 is much harder
to implement in C or C++. In fact both methods *were* implemented
easily in C.
OK, got that now. So Haskell doesn't have a *big* advantage over C w/r
to the ease of implementation of both algorithms?
In the case of these specific
- Original Message -
From: o...@cs.otago.ac.nz o...@cs.otago.ac.nz
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Can Haskell outperform C++?
-snip-
and if we want
to compare *languages*, we should use identical algorithms to make the
comparison fair.
In
Hi everybody,
I'm still working on implementing a nomic game in Haskell.
Although the game is pretty advanced, I'm still confused by one fundamental
question:
A nomic game is composed of rules.
A Rule is a sort of little program submitted by the player during the game.
They come in two fashions:
-
I find both heavy and redundant. The first forces me to specify if I want
an argument of not (with the constructors MR and NR)
I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean here.
Do you know of a construction/abstraction that allows having or not an
argument (a variable number of arguments,
Hi Christian,
thanks for the reply. I'm on a very similar boat regarding machine
learning as you.
What I'm interested in is AGI (Artificial General Inteligence), where
the machine learning is general (not specialized and limited in some
kind of way). I was thinking to make a small
I wonder if you want a typeclass here, rather than a type? A Normal Rule is
pretty much a State Transformer, while a Meta Rule seems like a
higher-order function on Normal Rules[*]. These are different kinds of
things --- and I say kind advisedly --- so perhaps better to define the
specific
I've been following the topic in both threads. Very nice discussion.
On 18 May 2012 18:51, Isaac Gouy igo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Moreover, being absolutely sure that the algorithms are in some sense
identical might make comparison pointless - for example, when the same
assembly
is generated by
Yes I totally agree, they have different kind. A Normal Rule is *
whereas a Meta Rule is * - *.
But I have no experience with typeclasses. That could be what I'm looking for!
What they have in common? Well, Id' say that a rule (whatever sort it is) can:
- change the state of the game when executed
15 matches
Mail list logo
