I just want to say that Windows support is much better than one could
get the impression from this thread. I use Haskell on Windows as well
as OSX and Linux. I think it works very well now, previously one had
to know a bit of trickery to get things done.
I don't think I have run into any more
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Albert Y. C. Lai tre...@vex.net wrote:
On 12-11-20 08:20 PM, Johan Tibell wrote:
This logic is flawed. More than 90% of computers having Windows doesn't
imply that 90% of all computers in a given household runs Windows.
What's the probability that your
This is one of the problem Syntactic aims to solve, but it requires you
to use a different representation of expressions (for good or bad). If
you want to keep your existing representation, then you have to use a
generic programming library that supports GADTs. I know at least the
Spine
The latest version of cabal-dev on Hackage does not seem to have had its
dependencies updated for GHC 7.6. Try installing off github
(https://github.com/creswick/cabal-dev).
Ian Sturdy
From: haskell-cafe-boun...@haskell.org
Thanks for the suggestion, I’ll do that. Here goes:
I deleted the ../user/appdata/roaming/ghc and ../cabal files, an uninstalled
Haskell-platform. (No trace of anything ghc on the disk.)
Then reinstalled Haskell, and ran “cabal update”, it said there was a new
cabal-install, but trying to
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Emil Axelsson wrote:
This is one of the problem Syntactic aims to solve, but it requires you to
use a different representation of expressions (for good or bad). If you
want to keep your existing representation, then you have to use a generic
programming
You should have a ghc directory under appdata, with
i386-mingw32-7.4.2\package.conf.d under it. There GHC tracks what
packages it knows about.
Niklas
From: Gregory Guthrie
Sent: 2012-11-21 15:11
To: Johan Tibell
Cc: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] cabal install... Trying to
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Gregory Guthrie guth...@mum.edu wrote:
The error seems odd to me (cabal-install-1.16.0.2 depends on
Cabal-1.16.0.3 which failed to install.), that an older version depends on
a newer one?
There was a minor bug in the Cabal library necessitating a point
OK; I took HTTP out, but still get the same error;
cabal: The following packages are likely to be broken by the reinstalls:
QuickCheck-2.4.2
haskell-platform-2012.4.0.0
Use --force-reinstalls if you want to install anyway.
One thing I notice;
Ghc reports: G:\Cabalghc --version
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Gregory Guthrie guth...@mum.edu wrote:
OK; I took HTTP out, but still get the same error;
cabal: The following packages are likely to be broken by the
reinstalls:
QuickCheck-2.4.2
haskell-platform-2012.4.0.0
Use
Thanks.
I’ll try to do another cleanup, but not sure what more I can uninstall or clean
out!
I did a system search for *ghc* and came up empty before reinstall; will try
again.
I have now managed to get from some broken packages to a broken system! ☺
Greetings,
Daniel
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Tits?
On Nov 21, 2012, at 9:43 PM, Daniel Trstenjak daniel.trsten...@gmail.com
wrote:
Greetings,
Daniel
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
The belly is between them... I can't unsee.
Homero Cardoso de Almeida
B.el Ciência da Computação - UNIFEI 2006
+
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:48 AM, MigMit miguelim...@yandex.ru wrote:
Tits?
This is not appropriate for this mailing lists, please take it
elsewhere. I suggest http://www.reddit.com/r/ruby
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
( . ) . ( . ) in particular seems to be a generalization of flip on -
hopefully there's something cleaner and more general though.
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Daniel Trstenjak
daniel.trsten...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
Daniel
___
Hi everyone,
As anyone following this mailinglist surely noticed, there are a few issues
regarding haskell packaging.
Lot of discussion is going on about how cabal contributes to the problems
and how things could be fixed by making our tools smarter (which is a great
thing to do IMHO).
I think
Thanks everyone for your replies.
I am not wedded to GADTs or really anything else. I am going to give the
syntactic library a shot over the next few days and see if I can hack
something together.
Thanks again for the papers and libraries.
Steve
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Sean Leather
Let's put some numbers on this.
(1) In this country, you can buy a second-hand dual core desktop for NZD 200
(roughly USD 165, EUR 130). You can buy a new laptop for NZD 400
(roughly USD 330, EUR 260). Not fancy machines, but more than adequate
to compile and build stuff. Shipping
* wagne...@seas.upenn.edu wagne...@seas.upenn.edu [2012-11-21 13:48:35-0500]
Today, we welcome into the world version 0.12.4 of Gtk2Hs[1], a set
of Haskell bindings to many of the libraries included in the
Gtk+/Gnome platform. Gtk+ is an extensive and mature multi-platform
toolkit for creating
Hello!
I saw a question on StackOverflow about the difference between isAlpha and
isLetter today. One of the answers stated that the two functions are
interchangeable, even though they are implemented differently.
I decided to find out whether the difference in implementation influences
I use
.@. (sometimes ...)
.#.
.$.
for the two three and four dot variations.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
The composition package on hackage has a few operators for this family
of operations too
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/composition/1.0.1.0/doc/html/Data-Composition.html
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 05:03:33PM -0500, Thomas Bereknyei wrote:
I use
.@. (sometimes ...)
.#.
.$.
for
Hi all,
My goal, eliminate the failure case in 'byte':
https://gist.github.com/4128503
I don't want my 'byte' function to fail at runtime or return $ Left
vector not 8 bits. I want it to return a Word8 for an 8-bit
bit-vector or not compile.
Is there an existing library that offers
Welcome to issue 251 of the HWN, an issue covering crowd-sourced bits
of information about Haskell from around the web. This issue covers the
week of November 4 to 17, 2012.
Quotes of the Week
* Ralith: [why some people don't use conduits/pipes] also, I think at
least some people are
Hi everyone,
As anyone following this mailinglist surely noticed, there are a few
issues regarding haskell packaging.
Lot of discussion is going on about how cabal contributes to the
problems and how things could be fixed by making our tools smarter (which
is a great thing to do IMHO).
I think
26 matches
Mail list logo