On 22 November 2012 03:22, Greg Fitzgerald gari...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
My goal, eliminate the failure case in 'byte':
https://gist.github.com/4128503
I don't want my 'byte' function to fail at runtime or return $ Left
vector not 8 bits. I want it to return a Word8 for an 8-bit
An idea. You can make a type:
data TestContains = TestContains Tweet TweetSet
and the make an Arbitrary instance for it. When you do
a recursove call you have three different tweets one new tweet
and two from the sub-calls. Then you can place one of them in the
result. In the end you will have a
On 20/11/2012 6:08 PM, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
On 21/11/2012, at 4:49 AM, c...@lavabit.com wrote:
Well, I don't know. Would it save some time? Why bother with a core
language?
For a high level language (and for this purpose, even Fortran 66 counts as
high level) you really don't _want_ a
Hi cafe,
I've been adding lots of types recently that looks more or less like:
newtype A = A ByteString
data B = B ByteString
This is great for extra type safety and letting the compiler do its job,
however getting the bytestring back requires boiler plate.
At the moment either you
Why not use
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/newtype/0.2/doc/html/Control-Newtype.html
instead?
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 14:15:00 + Vincent Hanquez t...@snarc.org
wrote:
Hi cafe,
I've been adding lots of types recently that looks more or less like:
newtype A = A
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Jacques Carette care...@mcmaster.cawrote:
On 20/11/2012 6:08 PM, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
On 21/11/2012, at 4:49 AM, c...@lavabit.com wrote:
Well, I don't know. Would it save some time? Why bother with a core
language?
For a high level language (and for
Greetings,
(x-posted from /r/haskell)
I am calling for any interested parties to come together and help me get a
SEA HUG going. My boss has offered to provide facilities and foods. I don't
think he's expecting much, maybe we can make him second guess the offer :P.
I have put together a meetup
On 11/22/2012 03:42 PM, kudah wrote:
Why not use
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/newtype/0.2/doc/html/Control-Newtype.html
instead?
interesting i didn't know about it, however it's seems relatively
unknown (can't find any library on hackage that use it) and just like
Serialize
On 23/11/2012, at 1:56 AM, Jacques Carette wrote:
On 20/11/2012 6:08 PM, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
On 21/11/2012, at 4:49 AM, c...@lavabit.com wrote:
Well, I don't know. Would it save some time? Why bother with a core
language?
For a high level language (and for this purpose, even Fortran
I believe the question you are asking is why do large software systems
need to be designed in terms of levels or some other software
engineering construct(s).
To manage their complexity as opposed to getting mangled in their complexity. :D
--
--
Regards,
KC
- completely remove the earlier Haskell Platform
- reboot
- defragment the partition/hard drive
- reboot
- install the newer Haskell Platform
- reboot
- defragment the partition/hard drive (recommended)
- reboot
- cabal update
- cabal install cabal-install
It seems like what is slowing down the
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:14:31 + Vincent Hanquez t...@snarc.org
wrote:
can't find any library on hackage that use it
http://packdeps.haskellers.com/reverse/newtype
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
12 matches
Mail list logo
