It never looked like a homework assignment to me, if someone puts as
much original thought into a mail than the OP, it's hard to believe he
wouldn't have mentioned the fact in case it was indeed homework.
Speaking of it, I don't really care whether something is homework or
not, what I care about
Jon Fairbairn jon.fairba...@cl.cam.ac.uk wrote:
That's where that particular design falls down. = is an
ugly symbol in the first place, and while the pun with a
lambda in the middle provides some intellectual
satisfaction, it doesn't outweigh the fussiness of its shape
or the irrelevant
Manlio Perillo manlio_peri...@libero.it wrote:
Do you plan to extend the package to any terminal, using terminfo
database?
Are there any non-ansi terminals left? I assumed they were extinct...
it'd come close to using EBCDIC.
--
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect
Ross Mellgren rmm-hask...@z.odi.ac wrote:
Way too many, definitely.
--
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers
for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting,
performance and/or quoting of this signature prohibited.
Wolfgang Jeltsch g9ks1...@acme.softbase.org wrote:
Is ___semi___ and adjective at all? In German, we say ___halb___ instead of
___semi___ and the semi ring becomes a Halbring.
Halbring as in halber Ring, isn't it? Synonymous with partly a
ring (which uses an adverb)... In german, you can tack
Don Stewart d...@galois.com wrote:
bulat.ziganshin:
http://freearc.org
btw, it have 35.000 downloads ATM
Awesome, and congratulations!
I wonder: have you thought about adding a cabal file, so we can
package it automatically for all the Linux distros? Then you'd have
access to
Csaba Hruska csaba.hru...@gmail.com wrote:
Some planned features:
+ skeletal animation (in progress)
+ physics (hpysics) integration
Add softbodies and IKA (scriptable) and you'll make me drool instead of
merely salivate.
--
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect
Peter Verswyvelen bugf...@gmail.com wrote:
The GHC documentation lists a lot of tweaks that can be done to the
garbage collector.
However, Haskell spin-offs like Timber http://www.timber-lang.org/
implement their own incremental garbage collector that is better
suitable for real-time usage.
Peter Verswyvelen bugf...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you mean with IKA? Inverse Kinematics Animation?
yep.
--
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers
for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting,
performance and/or quoting of this signature
Vimal j.vi...@gmail.com wrote:
The above are some of the features which I believe are necessary for
packet analysis (or, analytics maybe?). There could be more. I was
wondering if Haskell would be a good language to achieve these things.
I had a brief idea and started writing an application
Henning Thielemann lemm...@henning-thielemann.de wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Benjamin L.Russell wrote:
Why not ask new users to identify letters in a random bitmapped
image of a string, as is commonly done?
I assume, because those images are
1) not accessible by blind people
2)
Grzegorz Chrupala grzegorz.chrup...@computing.dcu.ie wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a serialization library other than the Data.Binary from
hackage?
There are Iteratees[1]. They're still grok-in-process___ community-wise
They are (afaik) currently only used for file input, though it's
certainly
Benjamin L.Russell dekudekup...@yahoo.com wrote:
balance
Stop right there. Any further word about what the Taiji means would
only make you look even more clueless. Take a scale if you want a
symbol for balance[1].
OTOH, laziness(yin) and strictness(yang) make a far better pair of
unified
Benjamin L.Russell dekudekup...@yahoo.com wrote:
OTOH, laziness(yin) and strictness(yang) make a far better pair of
unified opposites than the schemeish eval and apply (which's outer
essences are both yang, changing to yin only by means of what they
execute[2]).
Indeed. But strictness
Roel van Dijk vandijk.r...@gmail.com wrote:
What about the Rabbit of Caerbannog[1]. Looks cute on first sight,
but upon further investigation turns out to be a vicious killer.
Useful to quench any rumors of Haskell being a toy language. You just
need to look a bit closer.
[1]
Mark Spezzano mark.spezz...@chariot.net.au wrote:
Basically I___m asking if there are any kinds of ___common denominator___
function compositions that are used again and again to solve
problems. If so, what are they called?
Haskellers tend to cast their design patterns into functions and
Lyle Kopnicky li...@qseep.net wrote:
If it is a hurdle for me, I can imagine a lot of people are getting
frustrated at trying to distribute their binaries on Linux.
I don't think so. Developers usually just don't, and the distribution
packagers seem to enjoy their specific messes... otherwise,
Peter Verswyvelen bugf...@gmail.com
wrote:
Integrating hpysics with Grapefruit might be a good topic for the
Hackaton, trying to make a simple game (e.g. Pong or Breakout)
Be sure to have more than two simultaneously moving collision objects
besides paddles in the specs, or it won't get close
Luke Palmer lrpal...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think set theory is trivial in the least. I think it is
complicated, convoluted, often anti-intuitive and nonconstructive.
Waaagh!
I mean trivial in the mathematical sense, as in how far away from the
axioms you are. The other kind of
To wrap up:
While formalising, there is always a tradeoff between complexity of
the theory you're using and the complexity of it being applied to some
specific topic. Category theory hits a very, very sweet spot there.
--
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers
for
Eelco Lempsink ee...@lempsink.nl wrote:
The poll won't be public, but every subscriber to Haskell-Cafe
will get a (private) voting ballot by email.
What about us gmane users?
--
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers
for copyright history. All rights reserved.
Peter Verswyvelen bugf...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe this raises a new question: does understanding category theory
makes you a better *programmer*?
Possibly yes, possibly no. In my experience, you have to have a look at
how CT is applied to other fields to appreciate its clarity. Doing so,
you
Peter Verswyvelen bugf...@gmail.com wrote:
Lambda calculus is a nice theory in which every function always has
one input and one output. Functions with multiple arguments can be
simulated because functions are first class and hence a function can
return a function. Multiple outputs cannot be
Nicu Ionita nicu.ion...@acons.at wrote:
Hi,
Today I found the following problem when writing a simple function:
-- Whole info from a word8 list to moves
movesFromWord8s :: [Word8] - [Move]
movesFromWord8s (f:t:ws) = (f, t) : movesFromWord8s ws
moverFromWord8s _ = []
Here I made a
Brent Yorgey byor...@seas.upenn.edu wrote:
lilac: haskell's learning curve is like this: |
That's an understatement. cf
http://www.eve-pirate.com/uploads/LearningCurve.jpg
--
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers
for copyright history. All rights reserved.
Cristiano Paris cristiano.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
I had to append process and directory as dependencies but then it
worked. How can I submit a patch to Hackage? Do I have to contact the
owner?
In general, just try the maintainer and/or author adresses given on
hsc2hs's hackage page.
I'd
Ketil Malde ke...@malde.org wrote:
So it seems we're just tremendously lousy at generating random
Doubles.
We had this a while ago, and Don was kind enough to post some bindings
to dSFMT:
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/mersenne-random-pure64-0.2.0.2
which could
John A. De Goes j...@n-brain.net wrote:
Partial functions and dependent typing do not seem to play well together,
for instance.
Well, sure, they do, as long as you don't expect the typechecker to
terminate if some type it checks is formulated in unterminating code.
GHC already has this problem
Wolfgang Jeltsch g9ks1...@acme.softbase.org wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 26. Februar 2009 09:17 schrieb Ketil Malde:
Peter Hercek pher...@gmail.com writes:
Relinking against newer Gtk2Hs versions might not work.
You have the option of recompiling the new Gtk2Hs with the old GHC
and
Achim Schneider bars...@web.de wrote:
-calculus
PiSigma calculus, that is. I really shouldn't attempt to send unicode
via US-ascii.
--
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers
for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting,
performance
John A. De Goes j...@n-brain.net wrote:
What do you mean by progress? I noted before that there are
tradeoffs. Constraining the evolution of the language in backward
compatible ways leads to substantial improvements in tools,
libraries, and the speed of compiled code. That's progress in
John A. De Goes j...@n-brain.net wrote:
Are you saying has been no progress since KR C in the number of
libraries available to C programmers?
I never did, I asked you to compare usability. If you want it in plain
English, library semantics still suck, hell, there isn't even name
spacing.
Jonathan Cast jonathancc...@fastmail.fm wrote:
IDEs are for losers
Hell is freezing over: I'm actually agreeing with an editor heretic.
--
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers
for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting,
performance
Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm also interested in understanding the reasons behind the design of
the `recv` function in the network library.
POSIX semantics. And, frankly, I'm opposed to messing with them: If you
want to have different behaviour, please do a (different|wrapper)
Achim Schneider bars...@web.de wrote:
Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm also interested in understanding the reasons behind the design
of the `recv` function in the network library.
POSIX semantics. And, frankly, I'm opposed to messing with them: If
you want to have
Jonathan Cast jonathancc...@fastmail.fm wrote:
(I am actually writing my own language;
when I get something usable for real work, I may very well just plain
un-subscribe from haskell-cafe, even though I will continue using
Haskell for bootstrapping for some time after that.)
/me is curious.
Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com wrote:
There's another problem with the network APIs: they mirror the BSD
socket API too faithfully, and provide insufficient type safety. You
can try to send on an unconnected socket, and to bind a socket that's
already connected, both of which should be
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH allb...@ece.cmu.edu wrote:
On 2009 Feb 26, at 16:45, Johan Tibell wrote:
definition of `recv` would look like. My current thinking is that it
would mimic what C/Python/Java does and return a zero length
ByteString when EOF is reached.
Ew. Isn't this what Maybe
Jonathan Cast jonathancc...@fastmail.fm wrote:
I've been busy convincing myself I'm really trying to
replace TeX, instead. After all, TeX is clearly a much less adequate
programming language...
That's brilliant.
OTOH, remember Oedipus, who, by attempting to avoid hubris, got caught
right
John Lato jwl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
allb...@ece.cmu.edu wrote:
On 2009 Feb 25, at 5:23, John Lato wrote:
Brandon Allbery wrote:
I have to second this; I'm a Unix sysadmin, 98% of the time if I'm
writing a program it's for Unix
Peter Verswyvelen bugf...@gmail.com wrote:
So that is interesting. If you don't distribute a program that makes
use of LPGL libs (e.g. a downloadable EXE), but you provide a remote
view (in this case a web) on a server that runs that program, then
the license does not apply...
Oh well I
John Lato jwl...@gmail.com wrote:
you should consider that your unix-dependent software will never
reach over 80% of the computer users available.
Now it's me...
wtf? Why should I care? If those users are not even willing to bend
their little finger to safe me from breaking my back attempting
John Lato jwl...@gmail.com wrote:
I really don't see anything wrong with using Hoogle to increase
awareness (although I would appreciate it if platform-specific
packages were searched as an option).
You won't hear me argue against it, in fact, I argued in favour of it.
Increasing awareness of
John A. De Goes j...@n-brain.net wrote:
Personally, I'd be happy to see that explosion of innovation in the
library and tool spaces, even if it means the language itself stops
evolving (for the most part). It will make it a lot easier do use
Haskell commercially, and the innovators in
Achim Schneider bars...@web.de wrote:
whatever comes first.
uhhh, make that whatever comes last
--
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers
for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting,
performance and/or quoting of this signature
John A. De Goes j...@n-brain.net wrote:
The problem is that PL research is probably not going to stop
evolving in our lifetimes. Yes, that research needs a venue, but why
should it be Haskell? Haskell is a good language and it's time to
start benefiting from the research that's already gone
Thomas DuBuisson thomas.dubuis...@gmail.com wrote:
I still prefer showing all platform results sorted into separate
sections with headers, but understand that I am in the minority.
You aren't alone. Labelling them prominently with POSIX, UNIX, Linux,
*BSD, OSX resp. Windoze is a Good Thing:
wren ng thornton w...@freegeek.org wrote:
Though, I think it might be easier to have an icon next to the search
hits, rather than segregating by platform--- since
segregating/sectioning runs counter to relevance ranking.
While OTOH, this approach might rank low-level POSIX/Windoze libraries
Felipe Lessa felipe.le...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Antoine Latter aslat...@gmail.com
wrote:
The goal of XHB is to provide a Haskell implementation of the X11
wire protocol, similar in spirit to the X protocol C-language
Binding (XCB).
[snip]
Related projects:
Don Stewart d...@galois.com wrote:
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Protect_the_community
Random notes on how to maintain tone, focus and productivity in an
online community I took a few years ago.
Might be some material there if anyone's seeking to help ensure
we remain a constructive,
Kemps-Benedix Torsten torsten.kemps-bene...@sks-ub.de wrote:
Hello,
but to specify that ___this function turns a list into its sorted
equivalent___ would probably require to specify e.g. sort in terms of
the type system and to write code that actually does the sorting. The
first task is
Conal Elliott co...@conal.net wrote:
DRAFT version ___ comments please
Conal, please, PLEASE, never, EVER again use the word meaning if you
actually mean denotation. It confuses the hell out of me, especially
the (I guess unintended) connotation that you analyse the meaning of a
particular
wren ng thornton w...@freegeek.org wrote:
(b) allows
instances to have a fixed type for keys (like Data.Trie and
Data.IntMap have),
Can't we do some type magic to automagically select Data.Trie if the
key is a (strict) bytestring?
--
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity.
Bulat Ziganshin bulat.zigans...@gmail.com wrote:
execution times:
sum:
ghc 6.6.1 -O2 : 12.433 secs
ghc 6.10.1 -O2 : 12.792 secs
sum-fast:
ghc 6.6.1 -O2 : 1.919 secs
ghc 6.10.1 -O2 : 1.856 secs
ghc 6.10.1 -O2 -fvia-C
Robin Green gree...@greenrd.org wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:17:14 +0100
Achim Schneider bars...@web.de wrote:
Conal Elliott co...@conal.net wrote:
DRAFT version ___ comments please
Conal, please, PLEASE, never, EVER again use the word meaning if
you actually mean denotation
Bulat Ziganshin bulat.zigans...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Achim,
Friday, February 20, 2009, 5:44:44 PM, you wrote:
Nice! Now we know that gcc can calculate faster than Haskell can
calculate and print. Next time, use exitWith, please.
it was done in order to simplify sources. are you
Bulat Ziganshin bulat.zigans...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Peter,
Friday, February 20, 2009, 6:34:04 PM, you wrote:
Well C# does it with a for loop in 2300ms, and when using a
IEnumerable sequence it needs__19936ms. Very much like the Haskell
code. But of course the Haskell code could
Don Stewart d...@galois.com wrote:
No! This is not how open source works! You *should submit bug
reports* and *analysis*. It is so so much more useful than
complaining and throwing stones.
Exactly. I don't know where, but I read that the vast majorities of
Linux bugs are reported, nailed, and
Don Stewart d...@galois.com wrote:
(The bang patterns aren't needed). Note how he counts backwards from
10^9. Was there a reason for that, Bulat?
Tests against zero are faster, as you don't need a second operand... by
now, some platforms might be smart enough, but down-counting in loops
is
Bulat Ziganshin bulat.zigans...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Claus,
Friday, February 20, 2009, 11:15:59 PM, you wrote:
Turning this into a ticket with associated test will:
but why you think that this is untypical and needs a ticket? ;)
Bulat, you are right in every aspect. You never did
Bulat Ziganshin bulat.zigans...@gmail.com wrote:
so - why YOU think that ghc
generates fast code and this example is something unusual?
I think ghc has decent performance, and that there's room for
improvement. I don't care whether you compare it to gcc,
malbolge, or hand-written assembly,
Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Achim Schneider bars...@web.de
wrote:
Bulat, you are right in every aspect. You never did anything wrong.
Back when you debugged your code all night long, you were only
dreaming.
Achim, this doesn't
Bulat Ziganshin bulat.zigans...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Don,
Saturday, February 21, 2009, 12:43:46 AM, you wrote:
gcc -O3 -funroll-loops 0.318
ghc -funroll-loops -D64 0.088
So what did we learn here?
nothing new: what you are not
Bulat Ziganshin bulat.zigans...@gmail.com wrote:
but problem - not mine, but for haskellers, is that some people said
that ghc can generate code that is as fast as gcc one. it will be
stupid if someone will start to write say mpeg4 codec and after year
of work will find that it need 100 Ghz
Khudyakov Alexey alexey.sklad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday 20 February 2009 16:29:29 Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello haskell-cafe,
since there are no objective tests comparing ghc to gcc, i made my
own one. these are 3 programs, calculating sum in c++ and haskell:
main = print $
Peter Verswyvelen bugf...@gmail.com wrote:
nothing should stop you from writing video games in Haskell
Show me a studio that uses Haskell and I'd even accept dollars or pounds
as payment.
--
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers
for copyright history. All rights
Andrea Vezzosi sanzhi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Achim Schneider bars...@web.de
wrote:
Martin Huschenbett hus...@gmx.org wrote:
$ cabal install ghci-haskeline
Resolving dependencies...
cabal.exe: dependencies conflict: ghc-6.10.1 requires process
==1.0.1.1
Martin Huschenbett hus...@gmx.org wrote:
$ cabal install ghci-haskeline
Resolving dependencies...
cabal.exe: dependencies conflict: ghc-6.10.1 requires process
==1.0.1.1 however
process-1.0.1.1 was excluded because ghc-6.10.1 requires process
==1.0.1.0
cabal uninstall process-1.0.1.1 is
Peter Verswyvelen bugf...@gmail.com wrote:
Time on different cores does not progress monotonically
Two cores executing the same code are not guaranteed to finish them in
the same time span, due to caching, temperature, voltage jaggies,
quantum-mechanic inference, ...
--
(c) this sig last
What about making a SoC out of the problem? A mathematical markup
language that is easily written as well as valid Haskell, executable
within reason, compilable into mathML (think backticks) and would
revolutionise the typeset quality of literate programming?
--
(c) this sig last receiving data
Ketil Malde ke...@malde.org wrote:
Henk-Jan van Tuyl hjgt...@chello.nl writes:
My own research, using Google:
Search Hits
---
Java programming 20.400.000
LOGO programming 14.600.000
I get about that number of hits googling for logo
John Ky newho...@gmail.com wrote:
My question is: Is it possible to write a generic doLoop that works
over arbitrary functions?
Yes and no, that is, you can overcome the no.
The following code typechecks, and would run nicely if there was a
fixed version of reactive, by now[1]. Event handlers
Wolfgang Jeltsch g9ks1...@acme.softbase.org wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 11. Februar 2009 18:51 schrieb Don Stewart:
For example, if all the haddocks on hackage.org were a wiki, and
interlinked, every single package author would benefit, as would all
users.
You mean, everyone should be able to
Wolfgang Jeltsch g9ks1...@acme.softbase.org wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009 09:20 schrieb Achim Schneider:
Wolfgang Jeltsch g9ks1...@acme.softbase.org wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 11. Februar 2009 18:51 schrieb Don Stewart:
For example, if all the haddocks on hackage.org were a wiki
Jamie hask...@datakids.org wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Conrad Parker wrote:
2009/2/12 Don Stewart d...@galois.com:
Thanks for the analysis, this clarifies things greatly.
Feasibility and scope is a big part of how we determine what
projects to work on.
I agree that it's beyond
Daniel Kraft d...@domob.eu wrote:
Don Stewart wrote:
- Graphs.
True graphs (the data structure) are still a weak point! There's no
canonical graph library for Haskell.
That sounds interesting... What do you mean by no canonical
library? Are there already ones but just no standard
Peter Verswyvelen bugf...@gmail.com wrote:
Haskell seems to have pretty strong support for dynamic casting using
Data.Typeable and Data.Dynamic.
All kinds of funky dynamic programming seems to be possible with these
hacks.
Is this considered as being as bad as - say - unsafePerformIO? What
Evan Laforge qdun...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Alistair Bayley
alist...@abayley.org wrote:
2009/2/11 Cristiano Paris cristiano.pa...@gmail.com:
I wonder whether this can be done in Haskell (see muleherd's
comment):
Bulat Ziganshin bulat.zigans...@gmail.com wrote:
impossible
impossible, adj:
1) admittance of loosing an argument
2) tease to make someone do something
--
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers
for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring,
Sebastian Sylvan syl...@student.chalmers.se wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Achim Schneider bars...@web.de
wrote:
I got curious and made two pages point to each other, resulting in
as many stale continuations as your left mouse button would permit.
While the model certainly
I've been thinking a bit, and come to the conclusion that we should
just do it as others did it before: Start off with application-specific
tk's, figure out what's cool and what's compatible and then put them
into libraries. In short: Stop building cathedrals.
--
(c) this sig last receiving data
Jonathan Cast jonathancc...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Konsole
ctrl+shift+f, incremental, all matches highlight, case (in)sensitive,
regexen.
Konsole 2.1 (KDE 4.1.2), that is. I'd use its tab support, but I have
xmonad. In fact, it comes with a nice editor: I just have to type vi.
--
(c) this sig
Gregg Reynolds d...@mobileink.com wrote:
getChar = \x - getChar
An optimizer can see that the result of the first getChar is discarded
It isn't discarded. The first getChar results in a value of type IO
Char, always and ever. Whether or not the Char inside the IO Char gets
evaluated or
Peter Verswyvelen bugf...@gmail.com wrote:
I do have asked myself the question whether a really random
generating function could be regarded as pure somehow (actually
would a true random function still be a mathematical function?)
Wasn't there some agreement some time ago on this list that
Jonathan Cast jonathancc...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 20:55 +, Andrew Coppin wrote:
Deniz Dogan wrote:
Learn You a Haskell for Great Good (http://learnyouahaskell.com/)
Mmm, interesting.
Does anybody else think it would be neat if GHCi really did
colourise
First of all, thanks. I had almost judged the cafe to be unable to
discuss any UI issue except rendering backends.
Fraser Wilson blancoli...@gmail.com wrote:
You know, I read the Fudgets thesis, and threw together an experiment
which used Glade for layout and Haskell for semantics [1]. As
wren ng thornton w...@freegeek.org wrote:
I can see LaTeX as demonstrating that there is no such (single)
language. It seems to me that the elementary units (chapters,
sections, paragraphs,...) depend almost entirely on the domain of the
document (a book, an article,...).
This is what I had
Malcolm Wallace malcolm.wall...@cs.york.ac.uk wrote:
I would go with Bret Victor's argument (http://worrydream.com/
MagicInk/) that the concept of user interface as primarily
_interaction_ is misguided.
I tend to disagree. But then I'm a game developer, not an HTML monk...
what definitely
Conal Elliott co...@conal.net wrote:
[Spin-off from the haskell-cafe discussion on functional/denotational
GUI toolkits]
I've been wondering for a while now what a well-designed alternative
to CSS could be, where well-designed would mean consistent,
composable, orthogonal, functional,
Stephen Tetley stephen.tet...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, Shiva-VG - http://sourceforge.net/projects/shivavg - the
implementation of OpenVG that the Haskell binding works with supports
OpenVG 1.0.1, so it doesn't handle text at all.
You know, if the Haskell bindings are compositable enough, it
Duncan Coutts duncan.cou...@worc.ox.ac.uk wrote:
That is probably how people are getting into this mess. Using upgrade
is not necessarily such a good idea. It does not distinguish between
the interesting packages you might want to upgrade and the core
packages that your probably do not want
John A. De Goes j...@n-brain.net wrote:
How do you define layout in a way that has a direct an enormous
effect on interaction semantics???
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=faJ8N0giqzw
--
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers
for copyright history. All rights
John A. De Goes j...@n-brain.net wrote:
Perhaps I should have been more precise:
How do you define layout and interaction semantics in such a way
that the former has a *necessarily* direct, enormous impact on the
latter?
HTML/CSS is a perfect example of how one can decouple a model
Conal Elliott co...@conal.net wrote:
In the process, I realized more clearly that the *very goal* of
making a purely functional wrapper around an imperative library leads
to muddled thinking. It's easy to hide the IO without really
eliminating it from the semantics, especially if the goal is
Peter Verswyvelen bugf...@gmail.com wrote:
I should have mentioned that my tests have been done only on Windows
and OSX.
I guess I would have to try on a system that supports XRender to
compare.
Unfortunately, the target audience of our application are mostly
windows and OSX users, so
Claus Reinke claus.rei...@talk21.com wrote:
though software fallbacks for missing hardware
support would seem essential
You mean having widget renderers that don't use any of those frills,
don't you? Don't underestimate the breath of the target audience that
wants to run things on their
Maurcio briqueabra...@yahoo.com wrote:
Supposed I wanted to write a module with all C functions always
available, what could I let be there?
POSIX?
--
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers
for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring,
Maurcio briqueabra...@yahoo.com wrote:
Achim Schneider a __crit :
Maurcio briqueabra...@yahoo.com wrote:
Supposed I wanted to write a module with all C functions always
available, what could I let be there?
POSIX?
Is that portable for non-unix? I think cabal
does
Antony Courtney antony.court...@gmail.com wrote:
One issue I think you may encounter, though, is that last time I
looked, there was still no high-quality, widely available
cross-platform 2-D vector graphics library in C or C++! [...]
Xrender. It appears to map exceptionally well onto FP, is
Antony Courtney antony.court...@gmail.com wrote:
Pretty clear how to build a 2-D Scenegraph library
like Piccolo on top of Java2D or Quartz or GDI+; much less clear to me
how to build something like that directly on top of XRender.
I intended the scene graph to be implemented piece-wise
101 - 200 of 528 matches
Mail list logo
