On 2013-09-21, at 4:46 AM, Stijn van Drongelen rhym...@gmail.com wrote:
I do have to agree with Damodar Kulkarni that different laws imply different
classes. However, this will break **a lot** of existing software.
You could argue that the existing software is already broken.
If we would
I compiled and ran it a few hundred times in a script with no failures. I've
got the same version of GHC on OS X 10.8.3.
BTW, it's not just Yesod that has that bug you mentioned in the 64-bit version.
Cheers,
Bob
On 2013-04-30, at 11:37 PM, Sray s...@live.com wrote:
hi all
it seems i
Thanks everyone, I very much appreciate your help, and I think it did help.
I've spent the last few days implementing a substantial chunk of my system
using each of two different techniques. I've ended up going with and ADT
containing functions closed over the 'thing'. This seems to be the
for your convenience, the correct link:
https://lukepalmer.wordpress.com/2010/01/24/haskell-antipattern-existential-typeclass/
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Hi,
I'm relatively new to Haskell, and consider myself to be towards the beginner
side of the scale. Nevertheless, I've got this Haskell program I've been
working on that's sitting around 11k lines right now. The pattern has been to
let it grow to then knock it back by 'refactoring' or
On 2013-01-02, at 4:41 AM, MigMit miguelim...@yandex.ru wrote:
On Jan 2, 2013, at 2:26 AM, Bob Hutchison hutch-li...@recursive.ca wrote:
On 2013-01-01, at 3:47 PM, MigMit miguelim...@yandex.ru wrote:
Well, probably one of the reasons is that I've learned Eiffel later than
Haskell
On 2013-01-02, at 7:56 AM, Bob Hutchison hutch-li...@recursive.ca wrote:
You should read OOSC2. You'll find that this is completely consistent with
it. Don't forget that the 'C' in OOSC2 is 'contraction'.
'Construction' of course… the automated spell checker is not my friend
On 2013-01-02, at 1:52 AM, Mike Meyer m...@mired.org wrote:
[Context destroyed by top posting.]
MigMit miguelim...@yandex.ru wrote:
But really, Design by Contract — a theory? It certainly is a useful
approach, but it doesn't seem to be a theory, not until we can actually
prove something
Haskell, or anything else, doesn't have all the answers)…
he's talking about issues that are independent of programming language.
Cheers,
Bob
Thank you very much in advance.
Best regards,
Rico Moorman
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Bob Hutchison hutch-li...@recursive.ca
wrote:
On 2012
On 2013-01-01, at 3:47 PM, MigMit miguelim...@yandex.ru wrote:
Well, probably one of the reasons is that I've learned Eiffel later than
Haskell.
But really, Design by Contract — a theory? It certainly is a useful
approach, but it doesn't seem to be a theory, not until we can actually
On 2012-12-30, at 2:58 PM, Daniel Díaz Casanueva dhelta.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, my curiosity is bringing me to learn a new general purpose programming
language. Haskellers are frequently comparing Object-Oriented languages with
Haskell itself, but I have never programmed in any
On 2012-11-10, at 2:39 PM, Simon Hengel s...@typeful.net wrote:
Hi,
I've looked around with no success… this surprises me actually. Has
anyone embedded SpiderMonkey, V8, or any other relatively decent
JavaScript interpreters in GHC (using the FFI)?
I just started something [1].
On 2012-09-26, at 1:44 AM, Carter Schonwald carter.schonw...@gmail.com wrote:
what can we (the community ) do to address the fact that the haskell platform
installer suggestions for os x are sadly completely backwards? (or am I
completely wrong in my personal stance on this matter)
I'd
://nodejs.org/
-Greg
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Bob Hutchison hutch-li...@recursive.ca
wrote:
Hi,
I've looked around with no success… this surprises me actually. Has anyone
embedded SpiderMonkey, V8, or any other relatively decent JavaScript
interpreters in GHC (using the FFI
Hi,
I've looked around with no success… this surprises me actually. Has anyone
embedded SpiderMonkey, V8, or any other relatively decent JavaScript
interpreters in GHC (using the FFI)?
I did find http://justinethier.github.com/husk-scheme/ which is a scheme R5RS
implementation (I could make
15 matches
Mail list logo
