2013/4/8 Evan Laforge qdun...@gmail.com
Can't we just add some features to haddock? There are a lot of ways
to improve haddock a lot, and no one is doing them, so my impression
is that haddock doesn't really have active maintainers. Adding a
whole new backend seems risky, unless it results
2012/9/24 Edward Kmett ekm...@gmail.com:
Was there some significant change/bug introduced to haddock made between
2.10 and 2.12?
When I look at the haddocks for kan-extensions 3.1: Data.Functor.Yoneda
which purports to have been built by haddock 2.12 it shows all sorts of
spurious superclass
2012/9/8 Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com:
On 7 September 2012 23:19, David Waern david.wa...@gmail.com wrote:
-- Haddock 2.10.0 and 2.11.0
Two new versions of Haddock have been uploaded
. Diatchki
David Terei
Henning Thielemann
David Waern
-- Get Involved
We would be very happy to get more contributors. To get involved, start by
grabbing the code:
http://darcs.haskell.org/haddock.git
Then take
2012/3/4 Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gmail.com:
Thanks! Fixed upstream.
Let me bother you with another example (looks like a regression this time).
Example comes from probability-0.2.3.1 package (selfcontained example
attached).
Haddock seems to have stopped liking utf-8 special chars in
Peyton-Jones
Ryan Newton
David Terei
David Waern
Also thanks to Simon Hengel for spotting a serious bug before the release.
-- Get Involved
We would be very happy to get more contributors. To get involved, start
2012/3/3 Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gmail.com:
It seems to fail to generate buildwrapper documentation.
The minimal example:
-- Base.hs:
module Base where
-- | component in cabal file
data CabalComponent
= CCLibrary -- ^ library
{ cc_buildable :: Bool -- ^ is the library
2012/2/15 Aristid Breitkreuz arist...@googlemail.com:
In the source file, the Haddock documentation is there, no idea why it
doesn't show up.
Thanks, this could be a bug in the new Haddock version. We'll look into it.
David
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing
2011/12/8 Asger Feldthaus asger.feldth...@gmail.com:
Haskell doesn't seem to support disjunctive patterns, and I'm having a
difficult time writing good Haskell code in situations that would otherwise
call for that type of pattern.
I've also missed this after having done a bit of OCaml coding.
2011/12/6 Yves Parès limestr...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I noticed some time ago the fact that qualified imports doesn't affect the
generated documentation.
It's kind of clumsy in case of libraries that define a lot of synonyms
(vector and bytestring come in my mind first).
For instance, in the
2011/12/6 David Waern david.wa...@gmail.com:
2011/12/6 Yves Parès limestr...@gmail.com:
It should be written that this 'ByteString' is not a newly defined type but
instead a re-exportation.
It should be simple to add some kind of Re-export of link to
original thing tag to the Haddock
2011/12/6 Evan Laforge qdun...@gmail.com:
I've also often wished that unimported but fully qualified modules
like 'Data.List.partition' would link even if Data.List is not
imported. I suppose similarly to the way that s blind link
without having to know about the module in question.
That's
2011/4/28 jutaro j...@arcor.de:
So its a bit like running Haddock on a package, which usually may fail, but
it is uncommon to have this kind of problems. (It happened one time before
with a type level library, which defined all integers between 1 and several
thousands...).
If a package uses
To all undergrads on this list:
Are you a student looking for an internship? Do you want to work with
Haskell in the south of France? My company, Amadeus, is able to offer
an internship on the subject of property-based testing of XML schema
based web service APIs. The project goal is to write an
2011/3/12 Mathew de Detrich dete...@gmail.com:
Don't need to worry about this, its being fixed in the next release of
hamlet
So was it a bug in Haddock that you've worked around or something else?
Thanks,
David
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
2011/2/24 Lemmih lem...@gmail.com:
They will also be in the lhc repository once I restore it on code.haskell.org.
Lemmih,
while you're here, what's the status of LHC? It's an interesting
project but we haven't heard much from you lately.
David
___
2011/1/3 Antoine Latter aslat...@gmail.com:
For this I use:
'cabal haddock --internal'
Or if you're using haddock directly it's: --ignore-exports.
David
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
2010/12/11 Poprádi Árpád popradi_ar...@freemail.hu
Hi,
I have found nothing about this topic in the haddock documentation.
Is there a light way to do that?
Yes:
-- | picture-url-here
The documentation should be updated.
David
___
Haskell-Cafe
contributed patches to this release:
Tobias Brandt
Mark Lentczner
Ian Lynagh
Simon Marlow
Simon Michael
Ryan Newton
David Waern
-- Get Involved
We would be very happy to get more contributors. To get involved
2010/10/26 Claus Reinke claus.rei...@talk21.com:
Some questions about Haddock usage:
1. Haddock executable and library are a single hackage package,
but GHC seems to include only the former (haddock does not
even appear as a hidden package anymore). Is that intended?
Yes, I think that's
2010/10/24 Ryan Newton new...@mit.edu:
When I encounter a split-index (A-Z) page it can be quite frustrating if I
don't know the first letter of what I'm searching for. I want to use my
browser find! For example, tonight I wanted to look at all the functions
that END in Window in the Chart
Den 27 september 2010 18:22 skrev Jonas Almström Duregård
jonas.dureg...@chalmers.se:
HackageDB reports a build failure for happy-meta-0.1.1
(http://hackage.haskell.org/package/happy-meta-0.1.1), but from the
log it seems that the failure occurs when building the documentation.
The error is
2010/9/10 Conal Elliott co...@conal.net:
I'm updating a library (TV) and getting haddock parse errors for the doc
strings attached to GADT constructors. Is there a way to haddock-document
GADT constructors? I've tried both -- | ... before and -- ^ ...
after. Both give parse errors.
Lentczner
Ian Lynagh
Simon Marlow
Simon Peyton-Jones
Thomas Schilling
David Waern
-- Get Involved
We would be very happy to get more contributors. To get involved, start by
grabbing the code:
http
2010/9/2 Henk-Jan van Tuyl hjgt...@chello.nl:
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:00:56 +0200, David Waern david.wa...@gmail.com
wrote:
-- Haddock 2.8.0
A new version of Haddock, the Haskell documentation tool
2010/9/2 Daniel Peebles pumpkin...@gmail.com:
Mmm, delicious! Thanks to all involved! Any idea how long it'll take for
this to make it to hackage and regenerate all the documentation up there?
It'd be wonderful to do the same to the GHC documentation too.
I don't actually know yet if it's
2010/8/25 Alexander McPhail haskell.vivian.mcph...@gmail.com:
Perhaps Haddock could exclude class instance reporting when it cannot find a
documentable link to a parameter?
Yes, it should. BTW, we have a trac ticket for it:
http://trac.haskell.org/haddock/ticket/37
You can add yourself to
2010/8/19 Eyal Lotem eyal.lo...@gmail.com:
Can anyone point me towards existing work I could use? Open course
material and syllabuses I could use, with the necessary references?
At Chalmers University of Technology:
http://www.cse.chalmers.se/edu/course/afp/
David
2010/7/23 Ivan Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com:
On 22 July 2010 18:33, David Waern david.wa...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
We currently only support concrete examples (i.e. unit tests), but the
plan is to add support for QuickCheck properties.
Would you have some kind of inbuilt time
2010/7/21 Richard O'Keefe o...@cs.otago.ac.nz:
One of the really nice ideas in the R statistics system is that
documentation pages can contain executable examples, and when you
wrap up a package for distribution, the system checks that the
examples run as advertised.
The next version of
2010/7/4 Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com:
Andrew Coppin andrewcop...@btinternet.com writes:
In summary, I think we need to devise a way of better-documenting
class instances.
Haddock 2.7 supports documenting instance implementations; I don't know
how this works, but
2010/7/4 Daniel Fischer daniel.is.fisc...@web.de:
Hmm, it seems only partial: documentation attached to an instance is
shown in the list of instances under a type, but not the list under a
class.
I'm guessing that's to reduce noise...
I'm guessing it might have something to do with the
2010/7/4 Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com:
David Waern david.wa...@gmail.com writes:
2010/7/4 Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com:
Andrew Coppin andrewcop...@btinternet.com writes:
In summary, I think we need to devise a way of better-documenting
class instances
2010/7/4 Ross Paterson r...@soi.city.ac.uk:
It could be either way: sometimes you define a new class with instances
for existing types, and with the current implementation that produces
no documentation.
(I tested with type, class and instance in the same package.)
Hi Ross, thanks for
2010/7/4 David Waern david.wa...@gmail.com:
2010/7/4 Daniel Fischer daniel.is.fisc...@web.de:
Hmm, it seems only partial: documentation attached to an instance is
shown in the list of instances under a type, but not the list under a
class.
I'm guessing that's to reduce noise...
I'm
2010/6/15 Dominic Steinitz domi...@steinitz.org:
David Waern david.waern at gmail.com writes:
I think using --optghc=-package-conf is the correct way to point to
another package DB, so I'll look into why it doesn't work.
Perhaps another line of attack would be to see why haddock thinks I
2010/6/15 David Waern david.wa...@gmail.com:
2010/6/15 Dominic Steinitz domi...@steinitz.org:
David Waern david.waern at gmail.com writes:
I think using --optghc=-package-conf is the correct way to point to
another package DB, so I'll look into why it doesn't work.
Perhaps another line
2010/6/14 Dominic Steinitz domi...@steinitz.org:
..\ThirdParty\Haskell_Platform\2010.1.0.0\bin\haddock.exe BackendC\Core.hs
haddock.exe: can't find a package database at
E:\ghc\ghc-6.12.1lib\package.conf.d
But if I do haddock --help there is no option to set the package database and
I
2010/6/14 Dominic Steinitz domi...@steinitz.org:
Try --optghc=-package-conf --optghc=file, to point Haddock at the custom
DB.
Hi David, Thanks for the quick response. No dice I am afraid. Dominic. BTW
this
(using optghc) used to work on previous versions of haddock (iirc 2.4 and
2.5).
2010/6/14 David Waern david.wa...@gmail.com:
OK, it seems like the path from the ghc-paths package overrided what
you specified. I'm not sure this will work, but you could try:
haddock -B
c:\p4wksp\steinitd_fpf_exdate_ws\FPF_Dev.br\ThirdParty\haskell_packages\fpf.package.conf
Sorry
2010/6/14 Dominic Steinitz domi...@steinitz.org:
So I created one and copied our custom package databse into it but still no
luck:
..\ThirdParty\Haskell_Platform\2010.1.0.0\bin\haddock.exe -B
c:\p4wksp\steinitd_fpf_exdate_ws\FPF_Dev.br\ThirdParty\haskell_packages
backendc\PAD2C.hs
haddock:
2010/5/4 Evan Laforge qdun...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:23 PM, David Waern david.wa...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/5/4 Sean Leather leat...@cs.uu.nl:
Somewhat OT, but is there a place where we can request/review features in
the new HTML presentation of Haddock. Are there any mockups
Hi
Since version 2.4.0 Haddock has generated HTML output that uses frames
(index-frames.html) in addition to the normal output. We'd like to
deprecate this feature unless there is a significant amount of users.
The reason is two-fold:
* We probably want to replace the frames with something
2010/5/4 Sean Leather leat...@cs.uu.nl:
Somewhat OT, but is there a place where we can request/review features in
the new HTML presentation of Haddock. Are there any mockups of what the
pages might look like? I've had some ideas pop around my head every time I
look at documentation. ;)
2010/4/26 Daniel Fischer daniel.is.fisc...@web.de:
Am Montag 26 April 2010 22:18:53 schrieb Daniel Fischer:
Am Montag 26 April 2010 22:05:48 schrieb Ozgur Akgun:
So, how can we make use of this fix?
My guess:
$ cabal install haddock-2.7.2
No, it's not yet in there :(
Yes, I should make
2010/4/26 Daniel Fischer daniel.is.fisc...@web.de:
Am Montag 26 April 2010 18:15:02 schrieb Ozgur Akgun:
Hi all,
If I have the following data type:
data Expr = Num Int | Expr :+: Expr | Expr :-: Expr
Haddock handles the infix constructors, and generates a very nice output
(html in this
2010/4/9 Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 4:35 AM, Mark Lentczner ma...@glyphic.com wrote:
On Apr 8, 2010, at 6:55 PM, ViaToR (Alvaro V.) wrote:
I just finished writing my GSoC proposal ...
The project is about creating a new documentation tool for Haskell
2010/4/9 ViaToR (Alvaro V.) alv...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I just finished writing my GSoC proposal and I want to have some feedback
from the community. I'll try to be brief (this is not the proposal).
The project is about creating a new documentation tool for Haskell projects,
like Sphinx[1] for
2010/4/9 Alvaro Vilanova Vidal (viator) alv...@gmail.com:
2) Integration with Haddock docs.
I think it would be best if the pages generated by this system and the
pages generated by Haddock would be integrated as much as possible -
both style wise (sharing CSS, structure, headers, footers,
2010/4/9 Alvaro Vilanova Vidal (viator) alv...@gmail.com:
3) Configuration
I haven't looked at this yet but I suspect people will not want
another configuration file in their projects. Perhaps you could
propose some kind of Cabal integration instead.
That would be awesome. I have to see
The following people contributed patches to this release:
Isaac Dupree
Yitzchak Gale
David Waern
-- Get Involved
We would be very happy to get more contributors. To get involved, start by
grabbing the code
2010/2/12 Johannes Waldmann waldm...@imn.htwk-leipzig.de:
The annotated type of update is missing parentheses:
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/haskelldb/0.12/doc/html/Database-HaskellDB.html#v%3Aupdate
(compare with the signature given in the source) - Best, J.W.
Already fixed in
2010/2/9 Sean Leather leat...@cs.uu.nl:
I was browsing Hackage pointlessly and came across what appears to be
strange Haddock formatting here:
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/pointless-haskell/0.0.3/doc/html/Generics-Pointless-Functors.html#v%3Afmap
The following source
-- |
I think this is an instance of a bug introduced when implementing
cross-package documentation. It has been fixed already and will be in
the next minor release.
Sorry, I should have said that the /fix/ will be in the next minor
release, and not the bug, of course :-)
David
2010/2/3 John Millikin jmilli...@gmail.com:
Looking at (for example) the docs for 'bracket'[1], the parameter
documentation has been shifted up by one. The source code[2] looks
correct, so perhaps Haddock is parsing it incorrectly? Docs for other
functions, such as 'showSigned'[3], exhibit the
2010/1/29 Dennis Walter dennis.wal...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
I wonder if it is possible to have Haddock include the date and time
at which the documentation was generated. Ideally this should only
occur on index.html, but to have it in any file (e.g. in the footer)
would be OK, too. I couldn't
2010/1/17 Mark Lentczner ma...@glyphic.com:
AHA!
Note that after running cabal haddock we re-build all of our .hi and
.o files EXCEPT ./dist/build/HSsyb-with-class-0.6.1.o
And now, since TH generates random symbols, we have symbols in the new
.hi files that aren't in the old (and only)
2010/1/15 Niklas Broberg niklas.brob...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
The question I have is this: How can I get Haddock to omit listing
instances of package-internal data types for exported classes?
You currently can't, unfortunately. See:
http://trac.haskell.org/haddock/ticket/37
David
Simon Peyton-Jones
David Waern
-- Get Involved
We would be very happy to get more contributors. To get involved, start by
grabbing the code:
http://code.haskell.org/haddock
Then take a look at the bug
2009/8/26 Peter Verswyvelen bugf...@gmail.com:
Ouch, with all the great Haskell parsers like Parsec around I think I was
expecting a line/column number :-)
But I see a ticket is already open for this
http://trac.haskell.org/haddock/ticket/83
Yes, and the line-number part of that ticket has
2009/8/26 Peter Verswyvelen bugf...@gmail.com:
Oh, I just installed the Haskell platform.
I have
Haddock version 2.4.2, (c) Simon Marlow 2006
Ported to use the GHC API by David Waern 2006-2008
But I noticed that my bad comments were in the description of the cabal
file, not the source file
2009/8/16 por...@porg.es:
George Porges
s/Porges/Pollard/; Porges is just an alias :)
Oh, sorry about that! I tried to google on your email address but
didn't find anything, so I assumed Porges was your surname. I should
start sending out my release notes for revivew ;-)
David
2009/8/16 Maurício CA mauricio.antu...@gmail.com:
I read in haddock documentation that we write
definition lists like this:
-- �...@something@] Definition of something.
However, using that structure to document many
itens, I get a blank list of definitions, like
you can see in this
/haddock
-- Contributors
The following people contributed patches to this release:
Isaac Dupree
Ian Lynagh
Simon Marlow
Simon Peyton-Jones
George Porges
David Waern
2009/8/15 Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org:
David Waern wrote:
-- Haddock 2.5.0
A new version of Haddock, the Haskell documentation tool, is out!
If you're using GHC 6.10.2 and Haddock 2.4.2, you
2009/6/7 Dominic Steinitz domi...@steinitz.org:
Ha! It's yet another of haddock's quirks. If I replace -- ^ by -- then haddock
accepts {-#. I'll update the ticket you created.
-- | The parse state
data S = S {-# UNPACK #-} !BL.ByteString -- ^ input
{-# UNPACK #-} !Int -- ^ bytes
2009/5/24 br...@lorf.org:
Maybe most of the a.b people are thinking major.minor, and most of the
a.b.c people are thinking breaking.feature.implementation like the
rational RubyGems scheme described in
http://rubygems.org/read/chapter/7#page24 , but I don't know. It makes
it hard to describe
2009/5/22 Maurício briqueabra...@yahoo.com:
The new version of haddock makes use of GHC parser. How much
of effort would take to make haddock generate pretty-print
of the source code itself, (...)
(...) Is this what you want or is there some reason why you
want the code to be pretty-printed?
2009/5/22 Maurício briqueabra...@yahoo.com:
Hi,
The new version of haddock makes use of GHC
parser. How much of effort would take to make
haddock generate pretty-print of the source
code itself, including haddock documentation
(although probably loosing other comments)?
Maybe even an html
2009/5/15 Maurício briqueabra...@yahoo.com:
Hi,
I have a situation like this: module A imports R (a newtype
declaration) from module B, and lists it in its (module A)
export list.
Documentation for R is included by haddock in documentation
for module A, as I want. However, if my package
2009/5/20 Ross Paterson r...@soi.city.ac.uk:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 09:42:19AM +0200, David Waern wrote:
2009/5/15 Maurício briqueabra...@yahoo.com:
I have a situation like this: module A imports R (a newtype
declaration) from module B, and lists it in its (module A)
export list
2009/5/20 Maurício briqueabra...@yahoo.com:
I would still like to know the answer to my question though, since I
think we can improve Haddock here.
R is completely absent from documentation.
OK. That's strange. I thought that Haddock would at least show R but
without a link.
I did include a
2009/4/2 Duncan Coutts duncan.cou...@worc.ox.ac.uk:
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 22:13 +0200, David Waern wrote:
2009/4/1 jutaro j...@arcor.de:
I guess you mean the dialog which should help leksah to find sources
for installed packages. It needs this so you can go to all the definitions
2009/4/1 jutaro j...@arcor.de:
I guess you mean the dialog which should help leksah to find sources
for installed packages. It needs this so you can go to all the definitions
in the base packages ... This is very handy if it works. Look to the manual
for details.
Maybe could add support to
people contributed patches to this release:
Joachim Breitner
Roman Cheplyaka
Ian Lynagh
Neil Mitchell
Simon Peyton-Jones
Thomas Schilling
David Waern
-- Get Involved
We welcome new contributors. To get
2009/2/28 Colin Paul Adams co...@colina.demon.co.uk:
Colin == Colin Paul Adams co...@colina.demon.co.uk writes:
Gwern == Gwern Branwen gwe...@gmail.com writes:
Gwern On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Colin Paul Adams
Gwern co...@colina.demon.co.uk wrote:
Having just read the Haddock
2009/2/27 Colin Paul Adams co...@colina.demon.co.uk:
On http://haskell.org/haddock/doc/html/module-attributes.html the
not-home attribute is missing (it's documentation is present, but the
attribute itself is not named).
Thanks for the report.
By the way, the Haddock trac page is at:
2009/2/11 Gwern Branwen gwe...@gmail.com:
[^complaints]: I can hear the wankers in the peanut gallery - Yeah,
and it's been buggy ever since! Hush you.
Those (aforementioned) people should keep in mind we tried to keep the
scope of the project down to just making the new Haddock support the
2009/1/31 Andrew Coppin andrewcop...@btinternet.com:
In celebration of Hackage reachin over 1,000 unique packages, I decided that
I would re-visit the problem of attempting to build them on Windows.
I began by removing all existing Haskellness from my PC. I now have a
vanilla Windows XP
2009/2/6 Max Rabkin max.rab...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 4:25 PM, David Waern david.wa...@gmail.com wrote:
As for running arbitrary commands, I think we are opening up to a lot
of unfamiliar syntax. I'd like to hear what everyone thinks about
that.
I personally find it useful to have
2009/2/6 Alistair Bayley alist...@abayley.org:
[1 of 1] Compiling Test.Fail( Test\Fail.hs, Test\Fail.o )
Test\Fail.hs:11:26:
Can't make a derived instance of `Typeable Fail'
(You need -XDeriveDataTypeable to derive an instance for this class)
In the data type declaration
2009/2/6 Alistair Bayley alist...@abayley.org:
I have this test case for Haddock (2.3.0):
--
|
Module : Test.Haddock
Copyright : (c) 2009 Alistair Bayley
License : BSD-style
Maintainer : alist...@abayley.org
Stability :
2009/2/5 Ross Paterson r...@soi.city.ac.uk:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 10:41:20AM +0100, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
type-level built fine with GHC 6.8 but failed to build with GHC
6.10. The last line of the build log is this:
haddock: internal Haddock or GHC error: Maybe.fromJust: Nothing
Yes,
2009/2/5 Ross Paterson r...@soi.city.ac.uk:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 03:05:44PM +0100, David Waern wrote:
In Haddock 2.4.0 we switched from using the compilation mode of the
GHC API to a mode which does only typchecking. This broke Template
Haskell support:
http://trac.haskell.org/haddock
2009/2/5 Ross Paterson r...@soi.city.ac.uk:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 03:03:35PM +0100, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 5. Februar 2009 13:16 schrieb Ross Paterson:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 10:41:20AM +0100, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
type-level built fine with GHC 6.8 but failed to build
Hi everyone,
I received this question from Lennart Augustsson (via Simon M) and
thought I'd send out an inquiry to the Haskell community in general
(Lennart, I hope you don't mind):
Lennart writes:
We have some local patches for haddock that extends the blah
syntax so you can put TeX formulae
I got the subject line wrong, so I'm reposting this:
Hi everyone,
I received this question from Lennart Augustsson (via Simon M) and
thought I'd send out an inquiry to the Haskell community in general
(Lennart, I hope you don't mind):
Lennart writes:
We have some local patches for haddock
2009/1/29 Alistair Bayley alist...@abayley.org:
2009/1/29 Matthijs Kooijman matth...@stdin.nl:
I assume that it's procesing file Database.Enumerator.lhs when it
emits this, but I'm puzzled because the module name in
Database.Enumerator.lhs is certainly Database.Enumerator, and not
Main.
Any
2009/1/21 Stephan Friedrichs deduktionstheo...@web.de:
Hi,
using haddock-2.4.1 and this file:
module Test where
data Test
= NonStrict Int
| Strict !Int
| UnpackedStrict {-# UNPACK #-} !Int
The generated documentation looks like this:
data Test
Constructors
NonStrict
2009/1/18 Don Stewart d...@galois.com:
ross:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 09:12:32PM -0500, a...@spamcop.net wrote:
And FWIW, I agree with everyone who has commented that the documentation
is inadequate. It'd be nice if there was some way to contribute better
documentation without needing
2009/1/18 Duncan Coutts duncan.cou...@worc.ox.ac.uk:
Second, and this would take more work, I would like it if the Haddock
documentation for packages could be given a wiki-like and/or reddit-like
interface so that people could make comments about what is unclear or
needs better documentation
2009/1/10 Patrick Perry patpe...@stanford.edu:
Here's the haddock documentation; I'm not sure if Hackage honors {-#
OPTIONS_HADDOCK hide #-} when it displays the exposed modules:
http://quantile95.com/blas/
It should, so If it doesn't then please tell us about it. We have a trac at:
2009/1/10 Patrick Perry patpe...@stanford.edu:
Hi David,
The problem is with Hackage, not with haddock.
Oops, Sorry. I misread Hackage as Haddock :)
David
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
2008/12/12 Sean Leather leat...@cs.uu.nl:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 13:22, Thomas Schilling wrote:
The fromJust error is a bug, of course, however, the underlying
problem is a bit more difficult:
Haddock doesn't generate any code, it only typechecks. If the code
uses Template Haskell,
2008/12/12 Duncan Coutts duncan.cou...@worc.ox.ac.uk:
Let's see what David thinks. If he thinks is possible to fix these kinds
of things where haddock is not covering the whole GHC AST (at least to
the degree where it can ignore bits it does not understand). If that's
not realistic in the
2008/11/25 Thomas Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've noticed that many of the packages I upload to haddock don't build
documentation properly, although the documentation builds fine locally
when I run cabal haddock.
For example:
2008/11/21 Robert Greayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How does Hackage run 'haddock' on uploaded packages? I had assumed it
directly runs the cabal 'haddock' target, e.g.
runhaskell Setup.hs haddock
but it appears to perhaps be more complex than that.
Some backrgound --
haddock doesn't seem to
2008/11/6 Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Will .haddock files generated by haddock-2.3.0 work with haddock-2.4? If
not it would be preferable to have a 2.3.1 release or something for
distributions that want to package haddock separately from ghc (eg
gentoo). Otherwise we somehow have to hack
are:
Clemens Fruhwirth
Peter Gavin
Ian Lynagh
Neil Mitchell
Luke Plant
Thomas Schilling
David Waern
-- Get Involved
We welcome new contributors. To get involved, start by grabbing the code:
http
I think this is a bug in Haddock related to template-haskell
declarations. It will hopefully be fixed soon, but I'm afraid it won't
part of the 2.3.0 version that will come with GHC 6.10.1.
David
2008/10/27 Leonidas Fegaras [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry for the previous message. I am sending it
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
