gwern0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If the reader is still interested and still takes Haskell
seriously after puzzling over the foregoing, this would either
be pointless or off-putting. Well, *of course* there are
compilers for most computers. You aren't a serious
Andrew Coppin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Yeah, we should probably set up a seperate list for this
stuff...
Agreed. :)
This type of general discussions cannot be concluded. A board of bored
Haskellers socialize themselves.
To be honest, I didn't read that thing (in
jerzy == jerzy karczmarczuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
jerzy But, when J. Vimal threateneds us to throw away Haskell,
jerzy complained about monads, and most people confirmed that the
jerzy underlying theory is difficult, ugly, and useless, I began
jerzy to read those
