[Haskell-cafe] Re: syntactic sugar for comonads

2005-12-08 Thread Geoffrey Alan Washburn
Scherrer, Chad wrote: I'm wondering about a syntactic sugar for comonads. These are still very new to me, but it seems like their usage will become much more common once manipulations are more convenient (I believe this was the case with monads and arrows, correct?). I'm actually rather

[Haskell-cafe] Re: Monads in Java, Joy, OCaml, Perl, Prolog, Python, Ruby, and Scheme was Re: Other languages using monads?

2005-11-26 Thread Geoffrey Alan Washburn
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: Am Samstag, 26. November 2005 03:56 schrieb Geoffrey Alan Washburn: [lots of code] It's interesting to note how verbose Java is in comparison to Haskell, at least, concerning this monad stuff. I'd agree. However, my original point was that my version that uses

[Haskell-cafe] Re: Monads in Java, Joy, OCaml, Perl, Prolog, Python, Ruby, and Scheme was Re: Other languages using monads?

2005-11-25 Thread Geoffrey Alan Washburn
Shae Matijs Erisson wrote: Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My knowledge of functional programming is pretty much limited to Haskell, Scheme, and a smattering of Common Lisp. Are there languages other than Haskell that explicitly use monads? How about not so explicitly? Java