Re: [Haskell-cafe] The State of Testing?

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Christoph Breitkopf chbreitk...@googlemail.com wrote: Hello Thomas, On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Thomas Tuegel ttue...@gmail.com wrote: First, as author of the test suite code, let me apologize for the terrible documentation. This is absolutely NOT how

Re: [Haskell-cafe] The State of Testing?

--enable-library-coverage', Cabal will take care of _everything_ else for you, including excluding the test module from the coverage report. You should not have to put any flag gymnastics in your .cabal file. If this doesn't work for you, please let me know, because it's a bug. Thanks! -- Thomas

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Cabal test interface, what/where is it?

version. -- Thomas Tuegel ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

site, but the proposal submission form kinda mangled my formatting. There is a public Google Documents version of my proposal at https://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AZzNFnSY9FOeZGd6MnQ4cWNfM2Q2N2J0OWZnhl=en which should be up-to-date and contain all the information you need. -- Thomas Tuegel

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

structure? As you suggest in your other post, it would make sense to adapt test-framework to implement the interface specified by Cabal. I agree, as well; this is essentially the approach I took in my proposal. -- Thomas Tuegel ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

in different executables, or the test framework can provide command-line options for turning tests on and off. Those are the big two usage scenarios we've discussed for the detailed test interface, and I think these examples demonstrate why I think it may be unnecessary. -- Thomas Tuegel

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

, I'd love to hear them! Thanks! -- Thomas Tuegel ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

format for test results. That certainly seems to be widely supported; do you think it is suitable? -- Thomas Tuegel ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

[Haskell-cafe] Re: GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

! Thanks! -- Thomas Tuegel Throughout this proposal, examples are given to indicate how a package author would utilize the features proposed here. In all these examples, suppose that the programmer is the author of the 'haskell-foo' package, which exposes the module 'Foo' and has a single test

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

it at that? Thanks! -- Thomas Tuegel ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

executable(s)) That is an excellent suggestion that I will definitely adopt in my eventual proposal. Thanks! -- Thomas Tuegel ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

I apologize for spamming, but it only just occurred to me how to get the best aspects of both our ideas: On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Thomas Tuegel ttue...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Rogan Creswick cresw...@gmail.com wrote: The existing Executable sections may serve

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

, the executables get cut from the PackageDescription. Am I missing something? -- Thomas Tuegel ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Re: [Haskell-cafe] GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Rogan Creswick cresw...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Thomas Tuegel ttue...@gmail.com wrote: There are a few frameworks that provide limited degrees of this functionality.  I've recently added to test-framework so that the results can

Re: [Haskell-cafe] GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

is easier if we do this bit of plumbing for them. -- Thomas Tuegel ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

[Haskell-cafe] GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

with a such a lengthy message, and eagerly await your feedback! Thanks! -- Thomas Tuegel [1] http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/summer-of-code/ticket/1581 ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

[Haskell-cafe] Re: Analysing Haskell Program

Thomas Davie tom.davie at gmail.com writes: On 1 Aug 2008, at 16:01, Roberto D'Aprile wrote: Hello to everybody I'm using haskell for some research work and now i need to evaluate the performance of some simple haskell programs in particular information on the like, CPU cycles,