Could you create a comparison of Delve to other (potentially) similar
languages? For example, how is Delve similar/dissimilar to Clojure
and Scala?
I don't have any experience with Clojure at all, but looking at the
page, it would appear that Clojure does not support first-class
Delve is a new programming language intended to bring the benefits of
static type checking and functional programming to object-oriented
design and development. It is an impure, eager language (Yes I can
hear the groans of woe and cries for sanity already!)
Currently Delve supports:
This sounds great! I really like using yaml for web development.
However, my last use case was for a non-techie, so I created a little
desktop application for editing the yamlbase, if you excuse the
neologism.
I think it worked quite well, because the user was then presented with a
friendly
Hackage:
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/esotericbot
See the homepage for online copy of README and example configuration
file:
http://www.killersmurf.com/projects/esotericbot
Esotericbot is a sophisticated, lightweight IRC bot, written in Haskell.
Esotericbot
While just writing 33 instead of length [1..33] saves an awful lot of
bother, the function you'd probably want in similar circumstances is
`fromIntegral`
See the Prelude.
Also, you can use Data.ByteString.head instead of unpack and then
Data.List.head
rollDice :: Word8 - IO Word8
rollDice n =
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 20:54 +0100, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
I wasn't questioning the utility of John's library.
But I saw him mentioning unary numbers and I think it's a mistake to
use those for anything practical involving even moderately sized
numbers.
Also agreed! tfp supports rational
I've been doing some basic work on a support library for type level
programming ( see
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/summer-of-code/ticket/1541 ). I know
there have been similar attempts using fundeps ( Edward Kmett showed me
some of his work, but I've lost the address... ) but this approach
