Well, It looks like with 'transformer' look onto iteratees it is
possible to fold two streams without anything except Iteratee, yet some
complications arise. Even real zipping. for example merging two sorted
streams with output stream sorted, is expressible. More preciesely, I
tried to write a
From: Permjacov Evgeniy permea...@gmail.com
Hi. I Wrote a simple iteration library. It was not intensively tested,
so it MAY contatin bugs, but it is very unlikely. The library is
currently on github: https://github.com/permeakra/iteration
I'm not ready to upload it to hackage, as some
From: o...@okmij.org
Just for the record: the library IterateeM.hs, uses NO extensions to
Haskell98, let alone Haskell2010. The library as written requires
LowLevelIO.hs, which uses FFI (which has been Haskell98 addendum and
is in proper Haskell2010). The sample code, Wc.hs, for example, is
Just for the record: the library IterateeM.hs, uses NO extensions to
Haskell98, let alone Haskell2010. The library as written requires
LowLevelIO.hs, which uses FFI (which has been Haskell98 addendum and
is in proper Haskell2010). The sample code, Wc.hs, for example, is
Haskell98. So, the
John Millikin schrieb:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:43, Michael Snoyman mich...@snoyman.com wrote:
For the record, enumerator (and I believe iteratee as well) uses
transformers, not mtl. transformers itself is Haskell98; all FunDep
code is separated out to monads-fd.
Michael
iteratee also
Antoine Latter schrieb:
It's a mater of taste which way to go, but I prefer importing modules
qualified rather than have type-suffixes on functions - so I would
rather use 'I.next' and 'A.next' instead of 'nextI' and 'nextA'. But
reasonable people can disagree on this.
Hi. I Wrote a simple iteration library. It was not intensively tested,
so it MAY contatin bugs, but it is very unlikely. The library is
currently on github: https://github.com/permeakra/iteration
I'm not ready to upload it to hackage, as some testing and extension is
really needed. However, I'd
I only have some surface level questions/comments -
What existing packages is this similar to? How is it different from
any previous work in the area?
Also, likes looks like you don't need the 'Monad m' constraint on your
various Monad and Functor instances in Data.Iteration.Types, which I
think
Original Message
Subject:Re: [Haskell-cafe] A home-brew iteration-alike library: some
extension quiestions
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:07:49 +0300
From: Permjacov Evgeniy permea...@gmail.com
To: Antoine Latter aslat...@gmail.com
On 12/09/2010 10:54 PM, Antoine
Also, one thing that tripped me up is that your Stream type is
fundamentally different from the Stream types in the
iteratee/enumerator libraries - yours is more of a monadic list in the
inner monad, with explicit errors.
How does this change the operation of the Iterator type?
I hope I am not
On 12/09/2010 11:17 PM, Antoine Latter wrote:
Also, one thing that tripped me up is that your Stream type is
fundamentally different from the Stream types in the
iteratee/enumerator libraries - yours is more of a monadic list in the
inner monad, with explicit errors.
How does this change the
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Permjacov Evgeniy permea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/09/2010 11:17 PM, Antoine Latter wrote:
Also, one thing that tripped me up is that your Stream type is
fundamentally different from the Stream types in the
iteratee/enumerator libraries - yours is more of a
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:43, Michael Snoyman mich...@snoyman.com wrote:
For the record, enumerator (and I believe iteratee as well) uses
transformers, not mtl. transformers itself is Haskell98; all FunDep
code is separated out to monads-fd.
Michael
iteratee also uses 'transformers', but
13 matches
Mail list logo
