Hi Joachim,
Regarding information about Debian sid, I'd like to understand the exact
use case. Can you elaborate on that?
one use case is developers who use distro packages and want to tell
others against what version of the platform they develop their code
against.
I'll not add that
Do you see a way that you could incorporate distribution information?
I thought it would be nice to have a second table that correlates
Platform versions with distro releases, because I think this is relevant
to package authors.
Regarding information about Debian sid, I'd like to understand the
I compiled a chart that gives a side-by-side comparison of package
versions in various Haskell Platform releases.
Nice stuff but I cannot see alex or happy there.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 20.03.2012, 18:40 +0100 schrieb Simon Hengel:
Do you see a way that you could incorporate distribution information?
I thought it would be nice to have a second table that correlates
Platform versions with distro releases, because I think this is relevant
to package
This includes both, packages that come with ghc and platform packages.
Source is on GitHub[1].
Nice. Any chance you could get the packages sorted alphabetically so
that it's easier to look things up directly?
Sure, now they are sorted alphabetically (case-insensitive).
Before it was more
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 18.03.2012, 10:08 +0100 schrieb Simon Hengel:
I compiled a chart that gives a side-by-side comparison of package
versions in various Haskell Platform releases.
http://sol.github.com/haskell-platform-versions-comparison-chart/
This includes both, packages that come
Hi,
I compiled a chart that gives a side-by-side comparison of package
versions in various Haskell Platform releases.
http://sol.github.com/haskell-platform-versions-comparison-chart/
This includes both, packages that come with ghc and platform packages.
Source is on GitHub[1].
Cheers,
That's great! I think, it would be useful to include the version of the
shipped gcc (where applicable). Would that be complicated to add?
For windows, I looked them up once:
2011.4.0.0 - 4.5.0
2011.2.0.1 - 4.5.0
2011.2.0.0 - 4.5.0
2010.2.0.0 - 3.4.5
Cheers,
Sönke
Simon
That's great! I think, it would be useful to include the version of the
shipped gcc (where applicable).
I think this only applies to windows**; and I'd tend to put it into a
separate table.
But yes, open a ticket or send me a pull request (preferred!).
Cheers,
Simon
** Not really suer
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 20:28, Simon Hengel s...@typeful.net wrote:
** Not really suer about Mac OS X, but I think it requires Xcode, can
someone confirm this.
Yes, the platform on Mac OS X requires Xcode, which includes gcc.
Erik
___
** Not really suer about Mac OS X, but I think it requires Xcode, can
someone confirm this.
Yes, the platform on Mac OS X requires Xcode, which includes gcc.
Thanks.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
On 3/18/12 5:08 AM, Simon Hengel wrote:
Hi,
I compiled a chart that gives a side-by-side comparison of package
versions in various Haskell Platform releases.
http://sol.github.com/haskell-platform-versions-comparison-chart/
This includes both, packages that come with ghc and platform
12 matches
Mail list logo
