I recently uploaded fast-tags-0.0.3. The main thing is that all the
performance problems I was able to find have been fixed---hopefully
will no longer be mistaken as an April Fools joke! Here's copy and
paste from the hackage description:
Changes since 0.0.2:
Lots of speed ups, especially when
* Evan Laforge qdun...@gmail.com [2012-03-31 15:23:48-0700]
A while back I was complaining about the profusion of poorly
documented tags generators. Well, there is still a profusion of
poorly documented tags generators... I was able to find 5 of them.
So, that said, here's my contribution
On 1 April 2012 00:23, Evan Laforge qdun...@gmail.com wrote:
Two of them use haskell-src which means they can't parse my code. Two
more use haskell-src-exts, which is slow and fragile, breaks on
partially edited source, and doesn't understand hsc.
For what it's worth:
* As you say below, HSC
By the way, I'm assuming that this library isn't an April Fools joke
by making a library called “fast” with explosive O(n²) time problems.
:-P
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Chris: You might be experiencing this issue:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5783
Upgrading text and recompiling fast-tags should take care of this problem.
-Levent.
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Christopher Done
chrisd...@googlemail.com wrote:
By the way, I'm assuming that this
* haskell-src-exts is not slow. It can parse a 769 module codebase racking up
to 100k lines of code in just over a second on my machine. That's
good. Also, I don't think speed of the individual file matters, for
reasons I state below.
Wow, that's faster than my machine.
* Broken source
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Roman Cheplyaka r...@ro-che.info wrote:
It's useful to mention the limitations of this package, so that people
know what to expect and don't spend their time testing it to understand
that it doesn't suit their needs.
Good point, I'll put the limitations and TODO
A while back I was complaining about the profusion of poorly
documented tags generators. Well, there is still a profusion of
poorly documented tags generators... I was able to find 5 of them.
So, that said, here's my contribution to the problem: fast-tags,
haskell tag generator #6.
Why not use
On 1 April 2012 00:23, Evan Laforge qdun...@gmail.com wrote:
So, that said, here's my contribution to the problem: fast-tags,
haskell tag generator #6.
I like that it doesn't give duplicate entries for type signatures and
bindings. I'd like an option to recurse a directory, but i guess
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 5:11 PM, dag.odenh...@gmail.com
dag.odenh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 April 2012 00:23, Evan Laforge qdun...@gmail.com wrote:
So, that said, here's my contribution to the problem: fast-tags,
haskell tag generator #6.
I like that it doesn't give duplicate entries for type
10 matches
Mail list logo
