On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, John Meacham wrote:
Heh. I was just thinking I needed type level naturals last night at the
pub.
I thought about type level naturals yesterday when working with HList and
found that HList's dependency on TemplateHaskell is quite heavy.
I wanted to support gcc's
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:20:55 -0700
John Meacham j...@repetae.net wrote:
type family Add n m :: *
type instance Add Zero Zero = Zero
type instance Add Zero (SuccessorTo n) = SuccessorTo n
type instance Add (SuccessorTo n) m= SuccessorTo (Add n m)
Standard package
Hey everyone,
I am pleased to announce the release of the type-level-natural-number
package, which implements natural numbers at the type level. Although
there are many packages on Hackage that implement type level natural
numbers, this package is distinguished by its simplicity: it does not
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:28:19 -0700
Gregory Crosswhite gcr...@phys.washington.edu wrote:
Hey everyone,
I am pleased to announce the release of the type-level-natural-number
package, which implements natural numbers at the type level. Although
there are many packages on Hackage that
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 01:32:50AM +0400, Alexey Khudyakov wrote:
The envisioned use case is for annotating types with natural numbers, so
that extra functionality such as addition and subtraction of natural
numbers is unnecessary. Nothing is stopping someone from implementing
this
Heh. I was just thinking I needed type level naturals last night at the
pub. I wanted to support gcc's vector type extension in jhc
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Vector-Extensions.html
which allow diretly expressing vector operations that use the SIMD
features of modern CPUS, I didn't want
