On 30 September 2011 03:02, Claude Heiland-Allen cla...@goto10.org wrote:
On 30/09/11 02:45, DukeDave wrote:
1. Is there some reason (other than 'safety') that cabal install cleans
everything up?
As far as I've experienced and understand it, it doesn't - it's more that
GHC can detect when
Hi all, I've been trying to resolve a compile time issue[1] with
wxHaskell, and I thought I'd throw it open to see if anyone on cafe
can help.
Here's the crux of the issue:
The Setup.hs for wxcore (the major component of wxHaskell) uses
simpleUserHooks, overriding only confHook.
However there is
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:15 PM, DukeDave duked...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all, I've been trying to resolve a compile time issue[1] with
wxHaskell, and I thought I'd throw it open to see if anyone on cafe
can help.
Here's the crux of the issue:
The Setup.hs for wxcore (the major component of
On Friday, 30 September 2011 01:42:00 UTC+1, Antoine Latter wrote:
Why do you want to change the behavior of the 'clean' hook? Most users
would expect it to clear out everything that 'configure', 'build' and
such have done.
I would be cautious about subverting user expectations like that.
On 30/09/11 02:45, DukeDave wrote:
1. Is there some reason (other than 'safety') that cabal install cleans
everything up?
As far as I've experienced and understand it, it doesn't - it's more
that GHC can detect when Haskell modules don't need recompiling while
the same is not true for C or
