Chris Smith schrieb:
Sure... see quotRem in the prelude.
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haskell_programming_tips#Forget_about_quot_and_rem
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Thank you all.
I remember Hoogle'ing for rem and then quot but not finding qoutRem. :)
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Henning Thielemann
schlepp...@henning-thielemann.de wrote:
Chris Smith schrieb:
Sure... see quotRem in the prelude.
On Saturday 14 May 2011 15:55:15, Henning Thielemann wrote:
Chris Smith schrieb:
Sure... see quotRem in the prelude.
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haskell_programming_tips#Forget_about
_quot_and_rem
No, don't, just know when you want which.
quot and rem are what you get from the
:)
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Sure... see quotRem in the prelude.
On May 6, 2011 10:49 AM, cas...@istar.ca wrote:
:)
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
___
Hoogle is very useful for the kinds of questions where you can
estimate a likely type:
http://www.haskell.org/hoogle/?hoogle=Integral+a+%3D%3E+a+-%3E+a+-%3E+%28a%2Ca%29
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Chris Smith cdsm...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure... see quotRem in the prelude.
On May 6, 2011
