John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please tell me if I should just go away or go to another list here.
How about [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://software.complete.org/missingh/wiki/TransitionPlanning
Your comments (and edits! -- must register/login first) are welcome.
About
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 01:56:34AM -0600, Taral wrote:
On 12/1/06, Tomasz Zielonka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you accept contributions? I have some code I find very useful that
Yes!
would fit in the same places, like in Text.ParserCombinators.Parsec.Utils,
Data.BitsUtils (btw, why not
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 07:04:56AM +0100, Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
http://software.complete.org/missingh/wiki/TransitionPlanning
Your comments (and edits! -- must register/login first) are welcome.
As for other code (say Data.Tree.Utils), I am not sure what's best: put
it in some big
Please tell me if I should just go away or go to another list here.
Thanks again for all the feedback you've sent.
I've got the new MissingH website getting started, and I've posted there
the draft reorganization, module rename, and package split plan here:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 04:06:08AM +, John Goerzen wrote:
I've got the new MissingH website getting started, and I've posted there
the draft reorganization, module rename, and package split plan here:
http://software.complete.org/missingh/wiki/TransitionPlanning
Your comments (and
On 12/1/06, Tomasz Zielonka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you accept contributions? I have some code I find very useful that
would fit in the same places, like in Text.ParserCombinators.Parsec.Utils,
Data.BitsUtils (btw, why not Data.Bits.Utils?), Control.Concurrent.*.
Hey, contributions. I'll
