I checked out the video - nice - but I think, understandably, since
its not open source yet, not much of implementations details were
mentioned.
Yes, it's unfortunate.
So, I have this unanswered question nagging in my head. In the
example below, how can I let the makefile writer refer to
Thanks Neil,
main = do
want [file1]
file1 * \x - do
need [file2]
putStrLn Hello
putStrLn World
What if I want to mention file1 only once?
--
Regards,
Kashyap
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
Hello C,
Sunday, October 3, 2010, 6:59:25 PM, you wrote:
Thanks Neil,
main = do
want [file1]
file1 * \x - do
need [file2]
putStrLn Hello
putStrLn World
What if I want to mention file1 only once?
mention_only_once file action = do
want [file]
file * action
main =
mention_only_once file action = do
want [file]
file * action
main = mention_only_once file1 $ \x - do need [file2]
putStrLn Hello
putStrLn World
Thanks Bulat
I guess even this should work -
Thanks Emil ... yeah, that works...I was wondering what I could do to
not have to mention r1 explicitly.
I'll check out Neil's pdf and video now - perhaps I'll find answers there.
I checked out the video - nice - but I think, understandably, since
its not open source yet, not much of
Hi Neil ... how did the talk go?
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Neil Mitchell ndmitch...@gmail.com wrote:
What great timing! I will be giving a talk at the Haskell Implementors
Workshop tomorrow about the Make system Shake. It will be video taped
and I can send you the slides after I've
Neil's
* slides http://www.galois.com/~dons/talks/hiw-2010/ndm-shake.pdf
* video http://www.vimeo.com/15465133
ckkashyap:
Hi Neil ... how did the talk go?
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Neil Mitchell ndmitch...@gmail.com wrote:
What great timing! I will be giving a talk at the
Thanks Neil
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Don Stewart d...@galois.com wrote:
Neil's
* slides http://www.galois.com/~dons/talks/hiw-2010/ndm-shake.pdf
* video http://www.vimeo.com/15465133
ckkashyap:
Hi Neil ... how did the talk go?
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Neil
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Emil Axelsson e...@chalmers.se wrote:
How about:
execute (gcc -c ++ dependencyList ++ -o ++ target r1)
/ Emil
Thanks Emil ... yeah, that works...I was wondering what I could do to
not have to mention r1 explicitly.
I'll check out Neil's pdf and video now
Hi All,
I was thinking about doing an EDSL for Makefile (as an exercise)
I put down my line of thought here -
http://hpaste.org/40233/haskell_makefile_edsl
I'd appreciate some feedback on the approach. Also, I wanted some idea
on how(in the current approach) I could make the target name and the
Hi,
You might want to take a look at http://github.com/nfjinjing/nemesis
which is somewhat related.
Warren
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:41 AM, C K Kashyap ckkash...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I was thinking about doing an EDSL for Makefile (as an exercise)
I put down my line of thought here -
On 30/09/10 09:41, C K Kashyap wrote:
Hi All,
I was thinking about doing an EDSL for Makefile (as an exercise)
I put down my line of thought here -
http://hpaste.org/40233/haskell_makefile_edsl
I'd appreciate some feedback on the approach. Also, I wanted some idea
on how(in the current
Thanks Neil and Warren.
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Neil Brown nc...@kent.ac.uk wrote:
On 30/09/10 09:41, C K Kashyap wrote:
Hi All,
I was thinking about doing an EDSL for Makefile (as an exercise)
I put down my line of thought here -
http://hpaste.org/40233/haskell_makefile_edsl
Hi Warren,
You might want to take a look at http://github.com/nfjinjing/nemesis
which is somewhat related.
The above looks like a DSL approach and not an EDSL approach.
--
Regards,
Kashyap
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
How about:
execute (gcc -c ++ dependencyList ++ -o ++ target r1)
/ Emil
2010-09-30 10:41, C K Kashyap skrev:
Also, I wanted some idea
on how(in the current approach) I could make the target name and the
dependency available to the action writer - as shown below.
r1 = Rule {
Hi,
What great timing! I will be giving a talk at the Haskell Implementors
Workshop tomorrow about the Make system Shake. It will be video taped
and I can send you the slides after I've given the talk. So wait a
day, and I'll give you all the answers.
Thanks, Neil
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:02
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 13:05, Neil Mitchell ndmitch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
What great timing! I will be giving a talk at the Haskell Implementors
Workshop tomorrow about the Make system Shake. It will be video taped
and I can send you the slides after I've given the talk. So wait a
day,
What great timing! I will be giving a talk at the Haskell Implementors
Workshop tomorrow about the Make system Shake. It will be video taped
and I can send you the slides after I've given the talk. So wait a
day, and I'll give you all the answers.
Will you publish the tool too? ;-)
No :-(
18 matches
Mail list logo
