On 22/12/10 19:17, John Smith wrote:
On 22/12/2010 19:03, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 14/12/2010 08:35, Isaac Dupree wrote:
On 12/14/10 03:13, John Smith wrote:
I would like to formally propose that Monad become a subclass of
Applicative, with a call for consensus by 1 February. The change is
On 22/12/2010 19:03, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 14/12/2010 08:35, Isaac Dupree wrote:
On 12/14/10 03:13, John Smith wrote:
I would like to formally propose that Monad become a subclass of
Applicative, with a call for consensus by 1 February. The change is
described on the wiki at
On 14/12/2010 08:35, Isaac Dupree wrote:
On 12/14/10 03:13, John Smith wrote:
I would like to formally propose that Monad become a subclass of
Applicative, with a call for consensus by 1 February. The change is
described on the wiki at
3, John Smith volderm...@hotmail.com wrote:
I would like to formally propose that Monad become a subclass of
Applicative
I'm not in favour of this change because of the code breakage issue.
However, I think that an acceptable plan (mentioned elsewhere on the
list, but doesn't seem to have had
On 12/14/10 03:13, John Smith wrote:
I would like to formally propose that Monad become a subclass of
Applicative, with a call for consensus by 1 February. The change is
described on the wiki at
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Functor-Applicative-Monad_Proposal,
That page isn't written as a
