Just to keep haskell-cafe updated on this issue...
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 22:15 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
When I went to make my upload of MissingH 1.0.1, Hackage rejected it,
saying:
Instead of 'ghc-options: -XPatternSignatures' use 'extensions:
PatternSignatures'
Now fixed!
(Well, at
[snip]
The current a priori check, which said there were no fatal errors, while the
a posteriori check failed, is misleading. Wouldn't it be better to warn
potential
uploaders that this first check is not complete?
I'm not sure I see what you're getting at. We can't do a full build
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 16:19 +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
If there are any that you think are rejecting legitimate packages then do
complain (as in this thread).
I was sloppy in my upload of Emping 0.5 in not checking the libraries
dependencies sufficiently and not doing a build (my apologies
On Apr 21, 2008, at 7:38 , Hans van Thiel wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 16:19 +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
If there are any that you think are rejecting legitimate packages
then do
complain (as in this thread).
Configuring Emping-0.5.1...
cabal-setup: At least the following dependencies are
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 14:30 -0400, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On Apr 21, 2008, at 7:38 , Hans van Thiel wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 16:19 +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
If there are any that you think are rejecting legitimate packages
then do
complain (as in this thread).
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 13:38 +0200, Hans van Thiel wrote:
Configuring Emping-0.5.1...
cabal-setup: At least the following dependencies are missing:
gtk -any
I'll have to leave it at that, since my local Cabal version does configure
and build,
and I obviously can't use Hackage as a
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 22:15 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
When I went to make my upload of MissingH 1.0.1, Hackage rejected it,
saying:
Instead of 'ghc-options: -XPatternSignatures' use 'extensions:
PatternSignatures'
It hadn't rejected MissingH 1.0.0, even though it had the same thing.
I
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 13:59 +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Duncan,
Friday, April 18, 2008, 1:43:24 PM, you wrote:
older Cabal versions). We can make it stricter again in the future when
Cabal-1.4+ is much more widely deployed.
the problem, imho, is that such tools as Cabal, GHC,
Hello Duncan,
Friday, April 18, 2008, 1:43:24 PM, you wrote:
older Cabal versions). We can make it stricter again in the future when
Cabal-1.4+ is much more widely deployed.
the problem, imho, is that such tools as Cabal, GHC, Hackage should be
built with forward and backward compatibility in
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:43:24AM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
I have now fixed that by eliminating the use of Read in the .cabal
parser and basically adding an Other/Unknown constructor to several of
the enumeration types, including Extension. So as of Cabal-1.4 it will
be possible to add new
On Fri April 18 2008 4:43:24 am Duncan Coutts wrote:
It seems arbitrary that Hackage would suddenly reject this valid
usage.
Yes it is valid though I hope you can see the general intention of the
suggestion. If it were not for the compatibility problem it would be
preferable to use:
Sure,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Goerzen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri April 18 2008 4:43:24 am Duncan Coutts wrote:
It seems arbitrary that Hackage would suddenly reject this valid
usage.
Yes it is valid though I hope you can see the general intention of the
suggestion. If it
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] haskell-cafe@haskell.org
writes:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:43:24AM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
I have now fixed that by eliminating the use of Read in the .cabal
parser and basically adding an Other/Unknown constructor to several of
the enumeration types,
When I went to make my upload of MissingH 1.0.1, Hackage rejected it,
saying:
Instead of 'ghc-options: -XPatternSignatures' use 'extensions:
PatternSignatures'
It hadn't rejected MissingH 1.0.0, even though it had the same thing.
Now, my .cabal file has this:
-- Hack because ghc-6.6 and the
On 2008.04.15 22:15:29 -0500, John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled 0.7K
characters:
When I went to make my upload of MissingH 1.0.1, Hackage rejected it,
saying:
Instead of 'ghc-options: -XPatternSignatures' use 'extensions:
PatternSignatures'
It hadn't rejected MissingH 1.0.0, even
On Tuesday 15 April 2008 10:53:03 pm Gwern Branwen wrote:
On 2008.04.15 22:15:29 -0500, John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
scribbled 0.7K characters:
When I went to make my upload of MissingH 1.0.1, Hackage rejected it,
saying:
Instead of 'ghc-options: -XPatternSignatures' use 'extensions:
16 matches
Mail list logo