On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 12:53 -0700, John Millikin wrote:
In that case, I'll update my code and the wiki to use an alternative code
style.
Ok.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 09:21, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
Your local Cabal version is older than the one Hackage is using and
On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 21:06 +0100, John Millikin wrote:
According to http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Literate_programming,
the following should compile properly because the second block of code
will be ignored by GHC:
\begin{code}
main = putStrLn Hello world!
\end{code}
\begin{code}%
On Sep 28, 2009, at 12:21 , Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 21:06 +0100, John Millikin wrote:
According to http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/
Literate_programming,
the following should compile properly because the second block of
code
will be ignored by GHC:
\begin{code}
main =
In that case, I'll update my code and the wiki to use an alternative code style.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 09:21, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
Your local Cabal version is older than the one Hackage is using and that
older version lets haddock (ie ghc) do the pre-processing
According to http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Literate_programming,
the following should compile properly because the second block of code
will be ignored by GHC:
\begin{code}
main = putStrLn Hello world!
\end{code}
\begin{code}%
main = -- TODO
\end{code}%
However, Hackage's automatic build
