Is there an interest in hosting GHC on the JVM (besides my own).
There's interest but my understanding is that the GHC backend architecture is
not at all friendly to work with. That said, I hear in the next release (I
think 6.12, not the 6.10 that's in beta) will have a redesigned backend
for generating native code, it just didn't
seem worth the effort to shoehorn it into the JVM. Although I haven't
looked at any of the new backend stuff, I suspect it still won't be
suitable for the JVM.
-Brian
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Brian Alliet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:58:11AM +, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Is there an interest in hosting GHC on the JVM (besides my own).
Yep. I wrote a JVM backend for GHC (LambdaVM). It is suffering from
bit-rot though. I
haven't
looked at any of the new backend stuff, I suspect it still won't be
suitable for the JVM.
-Brian
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Sorry,
as Chris Eidhof replied to me CAL is not pure. I was only playing with
GemCutter, I don't use CAL so I didn't know.
Fero
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 5:32 PM, frantisek kocun
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
There is CAL language (purely functional, very Haskell like, the most I
have seen). CAL
On Saturday 11 October 2008 17:45:39 John A. De Goes wrote:
I have strong interest in hosting GHC on the JVM. And I suspect it
would be good for the Haskell community, as the JVM already runs on
nearly every machine known to man, has a wealth of cross-platform
libraries, and is getting
On Oct 12, 2008, at 6:19 AM, Jon Harrop wrote:
On Saturday 11 October 2008 17:45:39 John A. De Goes wrote:
I have strong interest in hosting GHC on the JVM. And I suspect it
would be good for the Haskell community, as the JVM already runs on
nearly every machine known to man, has a wealth of
There is CAL language (purely functional, very Haskell like, the most I have
seen). CAL Eclipse plugin (IDE for CAL for non java-ers) is incredible, with
support for code comletition, documentation, refactor, code navigation..
They have graphical editor GemCutter for it as well. You can use java
Are there, or have there been Haskell ports to the JVM? Are any of them
alive and well?
Is there an interest in hosting GHC on the JVM (besides my own).
I know I don't have time to tackle such a project but I'd be extremely
interested in using such a thing. Especially in my day to day work. I
LamdaVM was the only full-fledged effort to port Haskell to the JVM,
and like most graduate school projects, the project is now dead.
I have strong interest in hosting GHC on the JVM. And I suspect it
would be good for the Haskell community, as the JVM already runs on
nearly every
On 2008 Oct 11, at 12:07, David Leimbach wrote:
Are there, or have there been Haskell ports to the JVM? Are any of
them alive and well?
YHC, last I heard, was alive and well and there's a YHC Core backend
for the JVM.
Is there an interest in hosting GHC on the JVM (besides my own).
There's a YHC that can compile to JavaScript, and JavaScript can be
run on Java...
Which means, practically speaking, there is no YHC backend for the JVM.
Regards,
John A. De Goes
N-BRAIN, Inc.
http://www.n-brain.net
[n minds are better than n-1]
On Oct 11, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Brandon S.
Are there, or have there been Haskell ports to the JVM? Are any of them
alive and well?
See the thread started 9 September on Haskell and Java:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cafe/44252
Sean
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
13 matches
Mail list logo
