2009/5/17 Vasili I. Galchin vigalc...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I am confused between Haskell as delineated in the Haskell Report VS
ghc pragmas which extend Haskell beyond the Haskell Report. I am sure I am
not the first to ask. Caveat: on my part, I am not against
innovation/extensions, but I
On May 21, 2009, at 03:13 , Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
you would still be using KR C to get your work done, because you were
afraid of bloat.
Actually you'd still be using BCPL. :)
--
brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allb...@kf8nh.com
system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too
Vasili I. Galchin schrieb:
Hello,
I am confused between Haskell as delineated in the Haskell Report
VS ghc pragmas which extend Haskell beyond the Haskell Report. I am
sure I am not the first to ask. Caveat: on my part, I am not against
innovation/extensions, but I don't like to see
Hello,
I am confused between Haskell as delineated in the Haskell Report VS
ghc pragmas which extend Haskell beyond the Haskell Report. I am sure I am
not the first to ask. Caveat: on my part, I am not against
innovation/extensions, but I don't like to see language bloat. This is not
a
On May 17, 2009, at 02:32 , Vasili I. Galchin wrote:
I am confused between Haskell as delineated in the Haskell
Report VS ghc pragmas which extend Haskell beyond the Haskell
Report. I am sure I am not the first to ask. Caveat: on my part, I
am not against innovation/extensions, but I
