2012/12/19 Joachim Breitner m...@joachim-breitner.de:
if Michael Snoyman’s stackage will fly, I’d that would be a good
candidate for a default set.
+10
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
Thanks for the suggestion, Jan. Is there a way to include all of hackage?
Alvaro
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Jan Stolarek jan.stola...@p.lodz.plwrote:
I see that the comments are from years ago. Are there any ongoing efforts
to expand the default search set? (Or alternatively, to
Dnia piątek, 21 grudnia 2012, Radical napisał:
Thanks for the suggestion, Jan. Is there a way to include all of hackage?
Sorry, I don't know any way of doing this.
Janek
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
Searching Hoogle for symbols like `rstrip` or `lstrip` produces No
results found for me, even though they exist in the MissingH library.
To wit:
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/MissingH/1.2.0.0/doc/html/Data-String-Utils.html
Is this behavior intentional, or a regression of some
Hi Alvaro,
by default Hoogle only searches some standard set of packages, which is
only a relatively small subset of all Hackage content. From
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Hoogle#Scope_of_Web_Searches :
Using the standard web interface, Hoogle searches: array, arrows, base,
bytestring,
Thanks, Petr.
I see that the comments are from years ago. Are there any ongoing efforts
to expand the default search set? (Or alternatively, to implement the
+hackage modifier mentioned.)
Is there interest in either of these things happening?
Alvaro
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Petr P
Hayoo has them all:
2012/12/19 Radical radi...@google.com
Thanks, Petr.
I see that the comments are from years ago. Are there any ongoing efforts
to expand the default search set? (Or alternatively, to implement the
+hackage modifier mentioned.)
Is there interest in either of these
http://holumbus.fh-wedel.de/hayoo/hayoo.html
2012/12/19 Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
Hayoo has them all:
2012/12/19 Radical radi...@google.com
Thanks, Petr.
I see that the comments are from years ago. Are there any ongoing efforts
to expand the default search set? (Or
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 19.12.2012, 12:28 -0500 schrieb Radical:
I see that the comments are from years ago. Are there any ongoing
efforts to expand the default search set?
if Michael Snoyman’s stackage will fly, I’d that would be a good
candidate for a default set.
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Hayoo has them all [ .. ]
but Hoogle is better with types?
it seems Hayoo only does exact (string?) match on types,
while Hoogle also knows about polymorphisms, permutations etc.
E.g., search for String - Int.
Hoogle finds length :: [a]- Int as well,
I think Hayoo doesn't.
J.W.
10 matches
Mail list logo