Hi All,
Thanks for the general help on literate HTML. It seems that using
bird-tick style literate works better than \begin{code} style. I tried
it with my document, but quickly gave up - mainly because I decided
literateness did not fit with what I was doing.
You can compile a .html file with:
On 12/11/07, Neil Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I couldn't get it working either, so have raised a feature request bug.
Which has been merged into #1232:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1967#comment:1
--
vvv
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing
Hello,
You can compile a .html file with:
ghc --make -x lhs index.html
if you write the code like this:
code
foo = 1
/code
N.B. You need an empty line between code and the code and one between
the code and /code.
The -x flag doesn't seem to work for runhaskell, when I try this,
Hi
I want literate Haskell, but where the literate bit forming a document
is actually HTML, not latex. Does anyone have any idea how to go about
this?
For a start, how do I persuade GHC to run the file:
C:\Documents\Uni\tagsouprunhaskell index.html
Warning: ignoring unrecognised input
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Neil Mitchell wrote:
Hi
I want literate Haskell, but where the literate bit forming a document
is actually HTML, not latex. Does anyone have any idea how to go about
this?
The numeric-quest library was the first and only one that I have seen in
this style. I could only
On Dec 7, 2007, at 14:07 , Neil Mitchell wrote:
I want literate Haskell, but where the literate bit forming a document
is actually HTML, not latex. Does anyone have any idea how to go about
this?
You could replace the unlit executable in the GHC library directory
with one which knows how
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 19:14 +, Neil Mitchell wrote:
Hi Brandon,
You could replace the unlit executable in the GHC library directory
with one which knows how to extract Haskell code from HTML.
I want a solution so that I can write the tagsoup manual in an way
that can actually be
