Hi,
Short question: can I or someone else make the Hackage build bot
rebuild a package with a new dependency (even though the initial build
was successful)?
Long question:
Does anyone know what would cause the documentation of a successful
Hackage build not to appear on the web? Specifically I'm
Hello all,
I posted a minor update to unix-bytestring a few days ago in order to
deal with the Num not implying Eq thing in GHC 7.4, but it looks like
the documentation still hasn't been made (nor the built-on field).
Are the Hackage builders down intentionally since the recent crash, or
The problem isn't social pressure to be stable, it's the ambiguity of what
stable means. If Hackage 2 institutes a policy whereby things claiming to
be stable are treated better, then stable is likely to become the new
experimental.
I'd say, rather than rely on social agreement on what
On 10/25/11 3:54 AM, Gregory Collins wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:34 AM, wren ng thorntonw...@freegeek.org wrote:
I'm not so sure about that exemption. The experimental stability level
seems to be the norm on Hackage and often means I use this for real
projects, but because I use it for
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:34 AM, wren ng thornton w...@freegeek.org wrote:
I'm not so sure about that exemption. The experimental stability level
seems to be the norm on Hackage and often means I use this for real
projects, but because I use it for real projects I'm not quite willing to
hammer
On 25 October 2011 18:54, Gregory Collins g...@gregorycollins.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:34 AM, wren ng thornton w...@freegeek.org wrote:
I'm not so sure about that exemption. The experimental stability level
seems to be the norm on Hackage and often means I use this for real
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com writes:
Right, but first we need to define what all those terms _mean_... and
it's no good saying your package is stable if you change the API in
a large-scale fashion every release.
I think there are better criteria to use, like:
- do exported
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:17, Ketil Malde ke...@malde.org wrote:
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com writes:
Right, but first we need to define what all those terms _mean_... and
it's no good saying your package is stable if you change the API in
a large-scale fashion every
On 25 October 2011 20:17, Ketil Malde ke...@malde.org wrote:
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com writes:
Right, but first we need to define what all those terms _mean_... and
it's no good saying your package is stable if you change the API in
a large-scale fashion every release.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Ketil Malde ke...@malde.org wrote:
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com writes:
Right, but first we need to define what all those terms _mean_... and
it's no good saying your package is stable if you change the API in
a large-scale fashion every
Max Rabkin max.rab...@gmail.com writes:
This is useful information, but to call it stability is not only
misleading, but it also prevents the package from using that field to
indicate whether or not it is stable!
Oh, right - I'm not much interested in the stability of a package. What
I want
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 09:06:01AM +0100, Paterson, Ross wrote:
The distinction between synopsis and description is borrowed from the
Debian package format:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-binary.html#s-descriptions
The two fields are aimed at different audiences.
Not in
Good point. On the other hand, nobody points package authors to the
Debian documentation (and Debian also has review for newly uploaded
packages, as far as I know).
Re: review process -- Perhaps there would be a use for a review process
somewhere between haskell-platform and the unwashed
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Ryan Newton rrnew...@gmail.com wrote:
Good point. On the other hand, nobody points package authors to the
Debian documentation (and Debian also has review for newly uploaded
packages, as far as I know).
Re: review process -- Perhaps there would be a use for a
On 10/24/11 12:34 PM, Gregory Collins wrote:
Examples could include: Your package lacks a description, more than
X% of your modules lack toplevel module comments, fewer than Y% of
your toplevel exports have haddock comments, etc... Packages with
stability=experimental would probably be exempt
On 25 October 2011 13:34, wren ng thornton w...@freegeek.org wrote:
Before dealing with automatic documentation requirements, perhaps it'd be
better to develop a standard consensus on the terms used in the stability
field and actively advocating for people to adopt it, as was done with the
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 03:17, John Millikin jmilli...@gmail.com wrote:
The package summary is Type-safe ADT-database mapping library., which
gives some idea about what it does.
Whence my suggestion to show this on the package's page. Perhaps I
shouldn't have hidden that at the bottom -- I
Max Rabkin writes:
But I also have a concrete suggestion for Hackage: include the package
synopsis on the package's page. The distinction between synopsis and
description can be confusing, and sometimes it seems to violate DRY to
have the same info in both.
You may have missed the header on
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:06, Paterson, Ross r.pater...@city.ac.uk wrote:
Max Rabkin writes:
But I also have a concrete suggestion for Hackage: include the package
synopsis on the package's page. The distinction between synopsis and
description can be confusing, and sometimes it seems to
Hi all
Following a link from the Yesod book, I arrived at [1], curious to
find out what groundhog was. Once there, I learned... nothing:
This library provides just the general interface and helper
functions. You must use a specific backend in order to make this
useful.
[1]
The package summary is Type-safe ADT-database mapping library., which
gives some idea about what it does.
In my experience, any package that starts its source files with
{-# LANGUAGE GADTs, TypeFamilies, ExistentialQuantification,
StandaloneDeriving, TypeSynonymInstances,
I am surprised out of the whole list no one has stormed down on Nikita
for wanting to store passwords as plain text.
Nikita: never store passwords in plain text. Ever.
D.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 09:34, Никита Тимофеев ndtimof...@gmail.com wrote:
Does exist some simple examples using yesod
When I review the original post I see only a question:
Does passwords
stored in a database in an unencrypted form?
rather than a request.
So I'm not sure that was the intent.
I'm amazed that anyone (Sony!!!?) would store unencrypted passwords of
course.
Kevin
On Jun 14, 10:21 am, cheater
2011/6/14 Michael Steele mikesteel...@gmail.com:
Actually, that's not entirely accurate. The Yesod scaffolding tool
generates a site that uses mime-mail and sendmail, but there's nothing
inherent in yesod-auth requiring either.
My apologies for adding to the confusion. I see now that
Ah, I see how you could interpret what he wrote the way you describe.
If that's what Nikita has meant, then that's all fine. Hope there's no
harm in reminding this basic truth - better be safe than sorry! :)
D.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 15:00, Kevin Jardine kevinjard...@gmail.com wrote:
When I
Does exist some simple examples using yesod authentication except code of
Haskellers site? Does exist some examples using YesodAuthEmail?
For example, can i use third-party mail server instead of Sendmail for
YesodAuthEmail? Can i disable registration confirmation? Does passwords
stored in a
Does exist some simple examples using yesod authentication except code
of Haskellers site? Does exist some examples using YesodAuthEmail?
For example, can i use third-party mail server instead of Sendmail for
YesodAuthEmail? Can i disable registration confirmation? Does passwords
stored in a
Does exist some simple examples using yesod authentication except code of
Haskellers site? Does exist some examples using YesodAuthEmail?
Another example is Orangeroster [1].
For example, can i use third-party mail server instead of Sendmail for
YesodAuthEmail?
No. Email handling is done
2011/6/13 Michael Steele mikesteel...@gmail.com:
Does exist some simple examples using yesod authentication except code of
Haskellers site? Does exist some examples using YesodAuthEmail?
Another example is Orangeroster [1].
For example, can i use third-party mail server instead of Sendmail
Actually, that's not entirely accurate. The Yesod scaffolding tool
generates a site that uses mime-mail and sendmail, but there's nothing
inherent in yesod-auth requiring either.
My apologies for adding to the confusion. I see now that
Yesod.Auth.Email handles database interactions, generates
Hi
Is there a similar ticket for GHC to not export instances in the case that
other instances are explicitly specified?
module Foo (
Foo(Monad)
)
instance Monad Foo where ...
instance MonadState (Foo Bar) where ...
i.e. the monad instance gets exported but
On 4 September 2010 19:01, Alexander McPhail
haskell.vivian.mcph...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Is there a similar ticket for GHC to not export instances in the case that
other instances are explicitly specified?
module Foo (
Foo(Monad)
)
instance Monad Foo
Don Stewart wrote:
andrewcoppin:
Almost every release of GHC that I can remember has had the links for
the mtl package broken. (The Control.Monad.XXX modules are mostly from
mtl. But, for example, Control.Monad.Fix is from base. I bet you'll find
it works just fine.)
Well
Arnaud Bailly wrote:
Hello,
I installed (succesfully) HAskell Platform 2010.2 on windows and have
a small but annoying issue: Some links in HTML documentation lead to
broken links. I did not investigate all the links, but I have seen
that all doc under Control.Monad.XXX is missing. What am I
andrewcoppin:
Arnaud Bailly wrote:
Hello,
I installed (succesfully) HAskell Platform 2010.2 on windows and have
a small but annoying issue: Some links in HTML documentation lead to
broken links. I did not investigate all the links, but I have seen
that all doc under Control.Monad.XXX
On Thursday 02 September 2010 19:34:07, Don Stewart wrote:
andrewcoppin:
Arnaud Bailly wrote:
Hello,
I installed (succesfully) HAskell Platform 2010.2 on windows and have
a small but annoying issue: Some links in HTML documentation lead to
broken links. I did not investigate all the
On Thursday 02 September 2010 20:05:12, Daniel Fischer wrote:
Probably not. I'm on Linux and build my GHCs from source. There's no
directory mtl-1.1.0.2 in ~/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries although it's
linked to from the package index built with the compiler. (Hadn't
noticed before because I
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Daniel Fischer daniel.is.fisc...@web.de wrote:
On Thursday 02 September 2010 20:05:12, Daniel Fischer wrote:
Probably not. I'm on Linux and build my GHCs from source. There's no
directory mtl-1.1.0.2 in ~/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries although it's
linked to
Hello,
I installed (succesfully) HAskell Platform 2010.2 on windows and have a
small but annoying issue: Some links in HTML documentation lead to broken
links. I did not investigate all the links, but I have seen that all doc
under Control.Monad.XXX is missing. What am I doing wrong ?
Arnaud
On 1 September 2010 14:25, Arnaud Bailly arnaud.oq...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I installed (succesfully) HAskell Platform 2010.2 on windows and have a
small but annoying issue: Some links in HTML documentation lead to broken
links. I did not investigate all the links, but I have seen that all
Hi,
Here,
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/graphviz/2999.10.0.1/doc/html/Data-GraphViz-Commands.html#t%3AGraphvizCanvas,
there is an example of the internal implementation leaking.
I was taught to separate interface from implementation. For example, header
versus c/cc/cpp files. The
2010/8/25 Alexander McPhail haskell.vivian.mcph...@gmail.com:
Perhaps Haddock could exclude class instance reporting when it cannot find a
documentable link to a parameter?
Yes, it should. BTW, we have a trac ticket for it:
http://trac.haskell.org/haddock/ticket/37
You can add yourself to
Woops, nevermind. I WAS looking in the wrong place. I should've known
=P. Sorry for the unnecessary request.
-Eitan
PS.
For anyone interested all of the documentation is in
Graphics.Rendering.OpenGL.GL.PerFragment on hackage
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing
2010/7/23 Ivan Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com:
On 22 July 2010 18:33, David Waern david.wa...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
We currently only support concrete examples (i.e. unit tests), but the
plan is to add support for QuickCheck properties.
Would you have some kind of inbuilt time
2010/7/21 Richard O'Keefe o...@cs.otago.ac.nz:
One of the really nice ideas in the R statistics system is that
documentation pages can contain executable examples, and when you
wrap up a package for distribution, the system checks that the
examples run as advertised.
The next version of
David Waern wrote:
2010/7/21 Richard O'Keefe o...@cs.otago.ac.nz:
One of the really nice ideas in the R statistics system is that
documentation pages can contain executable examples, and when you
wrap up a package for distribution, the system checks that the
examples run as advertised.
The
Alexander Solla wrote:
After all, the source is always structured in more-or-less the same
way. Fragments of text with opaque -- unless/until you understand
them -- combinators join two distinct concepts/types into functions.
A chain of functions (potentially at various levels of
On 22 July 2010 18:33, David Waern david.wa...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
We currently only support concrete examples (i.e. unit tests), but the
plan is to add support for QuickCheck properties.
Would you have some kind of inbuilt time limit (similar to what mueval
has) for very long/complex QC
Ivan Miljenovic wrote:
* When writing the code, it's obvious what it does; as such you may
think any documentation you may offer is trivial (down the track,
however...).
* The author is familiar with a library; as such it may not be obvious
what extra documentation could be needed.
This is
On Jul 20, 2010, at 10:28 PM, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
What I don't see is HOW DO I USE THIS STUFF?
I think tutorials are the best way to do that (i.e., example normal
forms for the computations the library intends to expose). Perl's
package archive (the cpan) traditionally uses a
I'm giving some lectures this week about how to _read_ programs,
and I've had some things to say about JavaDoc and wondered whether
to show some examples of Haddock.
I took a certain library that has been mentioned recently in
this mailing list. (I shall not identify it. The author deserves
On 21 July 2010 15:28, Richard O'Keefe o...@cs.otago.ac.nz wrote:
I'm giving some lectures this week about how to _read_ programs,
and I've had some things to say about JavaDoc and wondered whether
to show some examples of Haddock.
I took a certain library that has been mentioned recently in
On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 10:45 -0500, Thomas Hartman wrote:
cabal haddock -–hyperlink-source
installs documentation with links to source code, which also be on by defualt.
cabal install –haddock-options=–hyperlink source
does not install hyperlinked source.
This is an instance of the lack
-source DID generate an
error in the output: target `hyperlink-source' is not a module name or
a source file
also, blogged about this here:
http://blog.patch-tag.com/2009/10/23/cabal-install-a-package-with-documentation
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
On a somewhat related note, I think the Haskell documentation in general is
rather
patchy and hard to follow for most things. Part of that I think is because
of the
confusion between the different forms of documentation. In general as a
programmer
I expect to find three kinds of documentation
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Kyle Murphy orc...@gmail.com wrote:
If they have to spend three hours trying to track down some obscure
research paper that's referenced in your documentation a half dozen times
in as many functions, you're not providing enough detail and assuming too
great a
From: Derek Elkins derek.a.elk...@gmail.com
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Iain Barnett iainsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 Oct 2009, at 13:58, John Lato wrote:
For anyone writing introductions to generic programming, take this as
a plea from Haskellers everywhere. If one of the RWH
Is it possible to automatically (or non-automatically) install
documentation when installing package with cabal-install?
Regards
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
It is. From command line:
cabal install package --enable-documentation
or add line
documentation: True
to .cabal/config or equivalent.
Best regards
Krzysztof Skrzętnicki
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 22:29, Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.comwrote:
Is it possible to automatically (or
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:37 +0200, Krzysztof Skrzętnicki wrote:
It is. From command line:
cabal install package --enable-documentation
or add line
documentation: True
to .cabal/config or equivalent.
Best regards
Krzysztof Skrzętnicki
Thanks a lot.
Regards
signature.asc
I like your proposal. Few notes below.
On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:45:31 -0400, Isaac Dupree wrote:
My dream situation: both haddock-pages and hscolour-pages would be
super-hyperlinked and super-readable. For example, haddock would list
all a module's definitions, not just its exports. In
who needs this kind of documentation?
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/tfp/0.2/doc/html/Types-Data-Num-Decimal-Literals.html
The code below is shown under 'Source' links
in that documentation. I don't understand it,
but it seems everything is generated automatically.
What should the
who needs this kind of documentation?
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/tfp/0.2/doc/html/Types-Data-Num-Decimal-Literals.html
The code below is shown under 'Source' links
in that documentation. I don't understand it,
but it seems everything is generated automatically.
What should the
On 12/06/2009 08:00, Michael Vanier wrote:
I've been trying to build ghc head from the darcs repo using these
instructions:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/GettingTheSources
Unfortunately, when I do
./darcs-all --extra get
as described under Getting more packages it fails
Hello everyone.
Last night I uploaded my first Hackage library with documentation
(StrictBench). I learned that it takes somewhere between 2 and 8 hours for the
link to the documentation to become active. This is confusing for first-time
package authors (I went to #haskell to ask what I had
On Jun 8, 2009, at 04:10 , Niemeijer, R.A. wrote:
Hence I wanted to ask if this is a bug or if there is a good
technical or social reason for it, and whether there is any way
around it.
Auto-running haddock on upload strikes me as a good way to open
hackage.haskell.org to a denial of
On Jun 8, 2009, at 04:36 , Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On Jun 8, 2009, at 04:10 , Niemeijer, R.A. wrote:
Hence I wanted to ask if this is a bug or if there is a good
technical or social reason for it, and whether there is any way
around it.
Auto-running haddock on upload strikes me as
. Allbery KF8NH [mailto:allb...@ece.cmu.edu]
Sent: maandag 8 juni 2009 10:41
To: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
Cc: Niemeijer, R.A.; haskell-cafe@haskell.org
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Slow documentation generation on Hackage
On Jun 8, 2009, at 04:36 , Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On Jun 8, 2009
Niemeijer, R.A. r.a.niemei...@tue.nl writes:
If that is the main concern, would the following not work?
[...]
Result: immediate documentation for every contributor with good
intentions
Or simply, on upload, generate the doc directory with a temporary page
saying that documentation will
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:05, Niemeijer, R.A.r.a.niemei...@tue.nl wrote:
which, face it, is going to be all of them; I doubt Haskell
is popular enough yet to be the target of DoS attacks
Second that. I think this is a good case in which some security should
be traded in for usability. And even
Thomas ten Cate wrote:
Niemeijer, R.A. wrote:
which, face it, is going to be all of them; I doubt Haskell
is popular enough yet to be the target of DoS attacks
Second that. I think this is a good case in which some security should
be traded in for usability.
Those who would trade security
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 11:24 +0200, Ketil Malde wrote:
Niemeijer, R.A. r.a.niemei...@tue.nl writes:
If that is the main concern, would the following not work?
[...]
Result: immediate documentation for every contributor with good
intentions
Having the server generate docs itself
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 04:36:14AM -0400, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
Additionally, I *think* haddock is run as part of the automated build
tests, which (again) happen on a regular schedule instead of being
triggered by uploads to avoid potential denial of service attacks.
That's
Hello.
I need the documentation of alex (a lexical analyser generator in
Haskell) in PDF format, so I used the Makefile in the doc directory of
the distribution of alex to get it.
But unfortunatly, the documentation includes some code listings that are
too wide and does not fit in the default
On http://haskell.org/haddock/doc/html/module-attributes.html the
not-home attribute is missing (it's documentation is present, but the
attribute itself is not named).
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
2009/2/27 Colin Paul Adams co...@colina.demon.co.uk:
On http://haskell.org/haddock/doc/html/module-attributes.html the
not-home attribute is missing (it's documentation is present, but the
attribute itself is not named).
Thanks for the report.
By the way, the Haddock trac page is at:
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 17:22 -0600, Louis Wasserman wrote:
In the documentation for Data.IntMap updateMin, a piece of example
code both communicates incorrect intuition, and fails to even compile.
updateMin :: (a - a) - IntMap a - IntMap a
updateMin (\ _ - Nothing) (fromList [(5,a),
In the documentation for Data.IntMap updateMin, a piece of example
code both communicates incorrect intuition, and fails to even compile.
updateMin :: (a - a) - IntMap a - IntMap a
updateMin (\ _ - Nothing) (fromList [(5,a), (3,b)]) -- code
straight from the docs
interactive:1:49:
Couldn't
About latest thread on better naming and documentation improvement, why
don't organize an interactive session where:
1) normal users tell what's wrong about a package/module documentation
2) the package/module author/maintainer fix the documentation in real
time, so that users can review it
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 15:12 +0100, Manlio Perillo wrote:
About latest thread on better naming and documentation improvement, why
don't organize an interactive session where:
1) normal users tell what's wrong about a package/module documentation
2) the package/module author/maintainer fix
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 03:12:21PM +0100, Manlio Perillo wrote:
About latest thread on better naming and documentation improvement, why
don't organize an interactive session where:
1) normal users tell what's wrong about a package/module documentation
2) the package/module author/maintainer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 15:12 +0100, Manlio Perillo wrote:
About latest thread on better naming and documentation improvement, why
don't organize an interactive session where:
1) normal users
Duncan Coutts ha scritto:
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 15:12 +0100, Manlio Perillo wrote:
About latest thread on better naming and documentation improvement, why
don't organize an interactive session where:
1) normal users tell what's wrong about a package/module documentation
2) the package/module
Nun Aurbiz wrote:
Where do I find the documentation for the FFI for GHC? I've read the
FFI report, the GHC user guide and scoured haskell.org but they all
gloss over what commands you actually need to give GHC and how to give
them. foreign import blah blah just gives me undefined references.
Where do I find the documentation for the FFI for GHC? I've read the FFI
report, the GHC user guide and scoured haskell.org but they all gloss over what
commands you actually need to give GHC and how to give them. foreign import
blah blah just gives me undefined references.
2008/11/8 Nun Aurbiz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Where do I find the documentation for the FFI for GHC? I've read the FFI
report, the GHC user guide and scoured haskell.org but they all gloss over
what commands you actually need to give GHC and how to give them. foreign
import blah blah just gives me
I'm on ubuntu, ghc 6.8.3. I built this using the Generic i386 Linux
build at http://www.haskell.org/ghc/download_ghc_683.html
How do I build local documentation that matches what I see at
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/ -- and am I
correct that this is 6.8.3 right now?
Hi,
I have regenerated Haddock documentation for Haskell modules included
into the Yhc Web Service.
http://www.golubovsky.org:5984/_utils/yhcws/index.html
Thanks.
--
Dimitry Golubovsky
Anywhere on the Web
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Hello Alfonso,
Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 11:32:20 PM, you wrote:
Excuse me for the subject, but IMHO is absolutely true. Anyhow, the
of course, you are right, but for practical goals i may suggest just
to read module sources instead of reading [had]docs. seeing the
implementation is much
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Bulat Ziganshin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Alfonso,
Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 11:32:20 PM, you wrote:
Excuse me for the subject, but IMHO is absolutely true. Anyhow, the
of course, you are right, but for practical goals i may suggest just
to
While trying to make Regex.TDFA 0.91 install on 6.8.2
I got
[10 of 21] Compiling Text.Regex.TDFA.RunMutState (
Text/Regex/TDFA/RunMutState.\
hs, dist\build/Text/Regex/TDFA/RunMutState.o )
Text/Regex/TDFA/RunMutState.hs:601:9:
Constructor `STUArray' should have 4 arguments, but has been
On 14 Dec 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but I got stuck fixing it because the array documentation isn't there
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/haskell98/Array.html
Try the hierarchical library docs:
Andrew Coppin wrote:
OTOH, I recently discovered that GHCi has the ability to show you what's
defined in a given module without me having to wait 40 seconds for
Firefox to start... Shame you can't scroll its output. (And still no
help if you're not sure of the module name.)
!!!
Run ghci in
Jules Bean wrote:
Andrew Coppin wrote:
OTOH, I recently discovered that GHCi has the ability to show you
what's defined in a given module without me having to wait 40 seconds
for Firefox to start... Shame you can't scroll its output. (And still
no help if you're not sure of the module name.)
On Sunday 09 September 2007 18:41, Andrew Coppin wrote:
[...]
Well, if I could collapse it with a single click, it would be much
easier to scroll past it and get to the thing I'm looking for. I didn't
say remove it, just give me the option to hide it. ;-)
OK, that shouldn't be too hard to
Neil Mitchell wrotes :
Replicating actual tables with CSS is a nightmare - you shouldn't use
table's for lots of things,
I agree
but there are sometimes when it really is
the best option.
Which isn't the case here !
Nested lists would easily do the trick...
Fixing up the CSS and still
Just bookmark: http://haskell.org/hoogle
It's not perfect, but it probably solves lots of your problems.
And if you use Firefox, you can even install Hoogle as one of the search
engines in the upper-right search box. Nice and fast!
-Brent
___
Sven Panne wrote:
On Sunday 09 September 2007 18:41, Andrew Coppin wrote:
Oh goodie... So it's there to keep the machines happy?
No, it's there to keep *me* happy when I'm looking for a module. ;-)
Well, there's over 200 modules relating to graph theory alone. (Modules
that I
Brent Yorgey wrote:
And if you use Firefox, you can even install Hoogle as one of the
search engines in the upper-right search box. Nice and fast!
I've never really understood what the benefit of this is... I mean,
Google make the Google toolbar, but what's the point? Why not just
click on
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 05:38:03PM +0200, Sven Panne wrote:
On Sunday 09 September 2007 16:40, Andrew Coppin wrote:
I have the following page bookmarked:
http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/
I'd like to ask 2 things.
1. Would it be possible to make the *huge* list of
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
