Ian Lynagh ig...@earth.li writes:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 11:50:44AM -0700, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
A complete rewrite with a new maintainer: fgl-awesome
In 10 years time, we don't want to have
fgl
fgl-awesome
fgl-great
fgl-joe
which all do the same thing, and have
Thomas Bereknyei are currently re-writing fgl (just about completely
from scratch) and we plan to make an initial release to get feedback
on the API in the next few weeks.
However, I'm sending this email out now to warn people that I highly
doubt any code that was written for the current version
ivan.miljenovic:
Thomas Bereknyei are currently re-writing fgl (just about completely
from scratch) and we plan to make an initial release to get feedback
on the API in the next few weeks.
However, I'm sending this email out now to warn people that I highly
doubt any code that was written
Oh, great, the email _did_ go out on the mailing lists (what with
haskell.org being down I wasn't sure it would).
Don Stewart d...@galois.com writes:
ivan.miljenovic:
Thomas Bereknyei are currently re-writing fgl (just about completely
from scratch) and we plan to make an initial release to
ivan.miljenovic:
Oh, great, the email _did_ go out on the mailing lists (what with
haskell.org being down I wasn't sure it would).
Don Stewart d...@galois.com writes:
ivan.miljenovic:
Thomas Bereknyei are currently re-writing fgl (just about completely
from scratch) and we plan to
Don Stewart d...@galois.com writes:
ivan.miljenovic:
We considered giving it a new name (fgl', etc.) but figured that in the
long term this wouldn't be advantagous. We feel that the situation is
analogous to QuickCheck: when the new version came out most people kept
using the old one
