Aaron Denney wrote:
This is drifting off-topic, but...
On 2008-06-03, Peter Hercek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron Denney wrote:
--- cut ---
Darcs patches are pretty much an implicit rebase.
You cannot push patch B if it depends on patch A without also
pushing A. And darcs currently does
Peter Hercek wrote:
But what about this git rebasing option? How to do it more easily
(than the solution I know and I described it later) in darcs?
using git-rebase --onto master next topic to get from:
o---o---o---o---o master
\
o---o---o---o---o next
On 2008-06-04, Peter Hercek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But what about this git rebasing option? How to do it more easily
(than the solution I know and I described it later) in darcs?
using git-rebase --onto master next topic to get from:
o---o---o---o---o master
\
On 2008-06-04, apfelmus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Hercek wrote:
But what about this git rebasing option? How to do it more easily
(than the solution I know and I described it later) in darcs?
using git-rebase --onto master next topic to get from:
to:
o---o---o---o---o master
Aaron Denney wrote:
On 2008-06-04, apfelmus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- cut --
Or the next-topic path relies on features from next that are not
present in master . But then, you're screwed anyway
Yep.
Well not really, depends what kind the dependency is, this kind of rebase
is useful
On 2008-06-03, Peter Hercek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Loup Vaillant wrote:
2008/6/3 Darrin Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--cut--
What's the appeal of this? I personally love git, but I thought all
the cool kids at this school used darcs and that was that.
Disclaimer: I'm no expert, this is
Aaron Denney wrote:
On 2008-06-03, Peter Hercek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Loup Vaillant wrote:
2008/6/3 Darrin Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--cut--
What's the appeal of this? I personally love git, but I thought all
the cool kids at this school used darcs and that was that.
Disclaimer: I'm no
This is drifting off-topic, but...
On 2008-06-03, Peter Hercek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron Denney wrote:
On 2008-06-03, Peter Hercek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Loup Vaillant wrote:
2008/6/3 Darrin Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--cut--
What's the appeal of this? I personally love git, but I
