list := '[' item* ';'? ']'
Indeed, it's the same idea as the 'else' in do-blocks.
Stefan
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Andrzej Jaworski himself at poczta.nom.pl writes:
Perhaps you can also figure out how to replace the disturbing $ operator?
I suggest in place of $. For example:
h x = f g x
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
DavidA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suggest in place of $. For example:
h x = f g x
I would feel better with : |
Ideally, redesigning Haskell syntax for 21st century should take more
scientific course.
But with know-how here still much lagging we can only tap on experience with
symbol
