Conrad Meyer wrote:
On Tuesday 10 February 2009 06:41:54 am Simon Marlow wrote:
John Goerzen wrote:
Just to close -- I will point out that ghci doesn't work on many
platforms that Hugs does (though ghc does). Hugs is the only
interpreter on some of these platforms.
I didn't see anyone follow
John Goerzen wrote:
Just to close -- I will point out that ghci doesn't work on many
platforms that Hugs does (though ghc does). Hugs is the only
interpreter on some of these platforms.
I didn't see anyone follow up to this so I'll just mention that nowadays
GHCi works wherever GHC works,
On Tuesday 10 February 2009 06:41:54 am Simon Marlow wrote:
John Goerzen wrote:
Just to close -- I will point out that ghci doesn't work on many
platforms that Hugs does (though ghc does). Hugs is the only
interpreter on some of these platforms.
I didn't see anyone follow up to this so
Hi
to mind), if Hugs is likely to continue to have compatibility problems
with GHC, then is there any way an interface similar to that already
available for WinHugs could be created for GHCi?
If that gets underway, one additional improvement could be to improve
the REPL at handling declared
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:41:49 -0600, John Goerzen
jgoer...@complete.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 09:18:55PM +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
[...]
But it takes a
community to make support viable; if the common libraries that
everyone uses don't work on Hugs, then people won't use it.
[...]
On 2009 Jan 28, at 0:15, Benjamin L.Russell wrote:
Although a GUI interface makes little difference to most UNIX/Linux
users, for some Haskell beginners in the Windows/OS X world, the
availability of a GUI interface could make the experience more
appealing, especially at first.
Given that some
