Mathew de Detrich deteego at gmail.com writes:
Haskell is still by far one of the best languages
to deal with concurrency/parallelism.
Sure, I fully agree.
I am using concurrency (with explicit forkIO, communication via Chan)
a lot (my Haskell application controls several external
On 07/09/2010, at 6:11 PM, Johannes Waldmann wrote:
Mathew de Detrich deteego at gmail.com writes:
Haskell is still by far one of the best languages
to deal with concurrency/parallelism.
Sure, I fully agree.
I am using concurrency (with explicit forkIO, communication via Chan)
a
2010/9/7 Ben Lippmeier b...@ouroborus.net:
Though be warned you must use a recent GHC head build to get good
performance. After GHC 7.0 is out (in a few weeks) we'll be able to release a
properly stable version.
Pardon a probably stupid question, but did I miss something ?
2010/9/7 David Virebayre dav.vire+hask...@gmail.com:
2010/9/7 Ben Lippmeier b...@ouroborus.net:
Though be warned you must use a recent GHC head build to get good
performance. After GHC 7.0 is out (in a few weeks) we'll be able to release
a properly stable version.
Pardon a probably stupid
This is not stupid, but yes you missed something :)
http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/dad6j/unless_theres_a_major_hiccup_itll_be_in_ghc_70/
Oh, I saw that thread, but at the time it had vrey few comments, so I
definately missed something !
Thanks !
David.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/7/10 05:08 , David Virebayre wrote:
2010/9/7 Ben Lippmeier b...@ouroborus.net:
Though be warned you must use a recent GHC head build to get good
performance. After GHC 7.0 is out (in a few weeks) we'll be able to release
a properly stable
http://book.realworldhaskell.org/read/concurrent-and-multicore-programming.html
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/GHC/Data_Parallel_Haskell
Although the last two edits on that page are from 2010 and 2009.
So what *is* the current status of DPH?
J.W.
waldmann:
http://book.realworldhaskell.org/read/concurrent-and-multicore-programming.html
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/GHC/Data_Parallel_Haskell
Although the last two edits on that page are from 2010 and 2009.
So what *is* the current status of DPH?
Note that DPH is a programming
Don Stewart dons at galois.com writes:
Note that DPH is a programming model, but the implementation currently
targets shared memory multicores (and to some extent GPUs), not
distributed systems.
Yes. I understand that's only part of what the original poster wanted,
but I'd sure want to use
waldmann:
Don Stewart dons at galois.com writes:
Note that DPH is a programming model, but the implementation currently
targets shared memory multicores (and to some extent GPUs), not
distributed systems.
Yes. I understand that's only part of what the original poster wanted,
but I'd
functional/declarative code automatically parallelizes,
Well, that's not really a good thing to say.
Sure, sure, and I expand on the details in my lectures.
But in advertising (the elevator sales pitch), we simplify.
Cf. well-typed programs don't go wrong.
- Johannes.
waldmann:
functional/declarative code automatically parallelizes,
Well, that's not really a good thing to say.
Sure, sure, and I expand on the details in my lectures.
But in advertising (the elevator sales pitch), we simplify.
Cf. well-typed programs don't go wrong.
Good! I
Before Haskell took off with parallelism, it was assumed that Haskell would
be trivial to run concurrently on cores because majority of Haskell programs
were pure, so you could simply run different functions on different cores
and string the results together when your done
It turned out that
*Mistake, in where I said majority of Haskell programs were pure I meant
majority of code in Haskell programs was pure
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Mathew de Detrich dete...@gmail.comwrote:
Before Haskell took off with parallelism, it was assumed that Haskell would
be trivial to run
14 matches
Mail list logo
