[Haskell-cafe] Re: Using Haddock to document ADTs

2007-10-23 Thread Simon Marlow
Alfonso Acosta wrote: I'm beginning to get familiar with Haddock and I want to document a library which, as usually happens, has some ADT definitions. I'd like to document the ADTs both for the end-user (who shouldn't be told about its internal implementation) and future developers. Haddock

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Using Haddock to document ADTs

2007-10-23 Thread Isaac Dupree
Simon Marlow wrote: Alfonso Acosta wrote: I'm beginning to get familiar with Haddock and I want to document a library which, as usually happens, has some ADT definitions. I'd like to document the ADTs both for the end-user (who shouldn't be told about its internal implementation) and future

[Haskell-cafe] Re: Using Haddock to document ADTs

2007-10-21 Thread Alfonso Acosta
On 10/22/07, Alfonso Acosta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: == Foolib.hs -- | This is Foolib which is aimed at whatever module Foolib (ADT) where import ADT === Sorry, I meant (although my error was probably obvious) == Foolib.hs -- |