On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 12:36 +, Joost Behrends wrote:
And concerning SQL: I like the parts of the language - all capitalized - as
landmarks in my code, even in modified forms like:
SELECT number, customer FROM ++ currcols ++
Here i see from afar, what the code around this line
I forgot 2 things:
The distinction between '=' and '==' is much like in C, although mixing
them up is not so dangerous like in C. ':=' and '=' like in Wirth
languages would be nicer.
Strangely nobody reacted on this. That a=a+1 is an infinite recursion here
(but _|_ obviously not
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:36:02 +0200, Joost Behrends [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I forgot 2 things:
The distinction between '=' and '==' is much like in C, although mixing
them up is not so dangerous like in C. ':=' and '=' like in Wirth
languages would be nicer.
Strangely nobody reacted on
Cristian Baboi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is more strange is that a = a + 1 and a = 1 + a are somehow
distinct. The second give a stack overflow almost instanly, but the
first don't.
That's because what the runtime does looks in the second case like
a = 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ... + a ...
and
On Dec 31, 2007, at 6:50 AM, Cristian Baboi wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:36:02 +0200, Joost Behrends [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I forgot 2 things:
The distinction between '=' and '==' is much like in C, although
mixing
them up is not so dangerous like in C. ':=' and '=' like in Wirth
Achim Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not specified though, the runtime could choose to let + force
the two chunks the different way round.
And that is probably also the reason why [1..] == [1..] is _|_.
Is Something that can be, in any evaluation strategy, be bottom, is
bottom
On 31 Dec 2007, at 10:43 AM, Achim Schneider wrote:
Achim Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not specified though, the runtime could choose to let + force
the two chunks the different way round.
And that is probably also the reason why [1..] == [1..] is _|_.
Is Something that can
Jonathan Cast [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31 Dec 2007, at 10:43 AM, Achim Schneider wrote:
Achim Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not specified though, the runtime could choose to let +
force the two chunks the different way round.
And that is probably also the reason
On 31 Dec 2007, at 1:33 PM, Achim Schneider wrote:
Jonathan Cast [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31 Dec 2007, at 10:43 AM, Achim Schneider wrote:
Achim Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not specified though, the runtime could choose to let +
force the two chunks the different way
Jonathan Cast [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Right click - Color Label - Red.
--
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for
past copyright information. All rights reserved. Unauthorised copying,
hiring, renting, public performance and/or broadcasting of this
10 matches
Mail list logo
