Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
Why are people suddenly using the term morally when they mean why
doesn't this do what I think it should? None of its definitions seem
to match what you mean:
The usage on this thread seems a bit nonstandard, but I'm assuming it's
based off the more general idiom
On Apr 15, 2010, at 08:49 , Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
Why are people suddenly using the term morally when they mean why
doesn't this do what I think it should? None of its definitions seem
to match what you mean:
That depends on how cynical you are about religion. :)
--
brandon s.
What happened was this:
1. add some modules to a library (but forget to mention them in the cabal file),
then (in the lib source dir, without cleaning/reconfiguring)
cabal install --global (runs without complaint)
2. re-compile an application that uses the library
(cabal configure
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 14:40, Johannes Waldmann
waldm...@imn.htwk-leipzig.de wrote:
What happened was this:
1. add some modules to a library (but forget to mention them in the cabal
file),
then (in the lib source dir, without cleaning/reconfiguring)
cabal install --global (runs
Johannes Waldmann waldm...@imn.htwk-leipzig.de writes:
What happened was this:
I still don't see why this other-modules is needed.
Ok, I understand the technical reason that cabal
does not do dependency analysis but morally, it should?
Why are people suddenly using the term morally when they
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
Johannes Waldmann waldm...@imn.htwk-leipzig.de writes:
What happened was this:
I still don't see why this other-modules is needed.
Ok, I understand the technical reason that cabal
does not do dependency
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Dougal Stanton
dou...@dougalstanton.net wrote:
'Morally' seems just the perfect word for this occasion --- concerned
with right or proper conduct. In this case, potential discrepancies
between the files that cabal 'knows' about when issuing different
commands;