Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: cabal: other-modules

2010-04-18 Thread wren ng thornton
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote: Why are people suddenly using the term morally when they mean why doesn't this do what I think it should? None of its definitions seem to match what you mean: The usage on this thread seems a bit nonstandard, but I'm assuming it's based off the more general idiom

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: cabal: other-modules

2010-04-17 Thread Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
On Apr 15, 2010, at 08:49 , Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote: Why are people suddenly using the term morally when they mean why doesn't this do what I think it should? None of its definitions seem to match what you mean: That depends on how cynical you are about religion. :) -- brandon s.

[Haskell-cafe] Re: cabal: other-modules

2010-04-15 Thread Johannes Waldmann
What happened was this: 1. add some modules to a library (but forget to mention them in the cabal file), then (in the lib source dir, without cleaning/reconfiguring) cabal install --global (runs without complaint) 2. re-compile an application that uses the library (cabal configure

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: cabal: other-modules

2010-04-15 Thread José Pedro Magalhães
Hi, On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 14:40, Johannes Waldmann waldm...@imn.htwk-leipzig.de wrote: What happened was this: 1. add some modules to a library (but forget to mention them in the cabal file), then (in the lib source dir, without cleaning/reconfiguring) cabal install --global (runs

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: cabal: other-modules

2010-04-15 Thread Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
Johannes Waldmann waldm...@imn.htwk-leipzig.de writes: What happened was this: I still don't see why this other-modules is needed. Ok, I understand the technical reason that cabal does not do dependency analysis but morally, it should? Why are people suddenly using the term morally when they

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: cabal: other-modules

2010-04-15 Thread Dougal Stanton
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote: Johannes Waldmann waldm...@imn.htwk-leipzig.de writes: What happened was this: I still don't see why this other-modules is needed. Ok, I understand the technical reason that cabal does not do dependency

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: cabal: other-modules

2010-04-15 Thread Casey McCann
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Dougal Stanton dou...@dougalstanton.net wrote: 'Morally' seems just the perfect word for this occasion --- concerned with right or proper conduct. In this case, potential discrepancies between the files that cabal 'knows' about when issuing different commands;