Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: towards a new foundation for set theory with atoms

2007-08-12 Thread Greg Meredith
Brandon, Cool. Well spotted. i was thinking a lot about the symmetry in the type space as a kind of group. i'll play around with your suggestion. Best wishes, --greg On 8/11/07, Brandon Michael Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 03:54:23PM -0700, Greg Meredith wrote:

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: towards a new foundation for set theory with atoms

2007-08-11 Thread Brandon Michael Moore
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 03:54:23PM -0700, Greg Meredith wrote: Haskellians, A quick follow up. If you look at the code that i have written there is a great deal of repeated structure. Each of these different kinds of sets and atoms are isomorphic copies of each other. Because, however, of

[Haskell-cafe] Re: towards a new foundation for set theory with atoms

2007-08-10 Thread Greg Meredith
Haskellians, A quick follow up. If you look at the code that i have written there is a great deal of repeated structure. Each of these different kinds of sets and atoms are isomorphic copies of each other. Because, however, of the alternation discipline, i could see no way to abstract the