On 12/8/11 11:12 AM, Christoph Breitkopf wrote:
Hello,
I'm in the process of implementing a container data type, and wonder what
class instances are generally considered necessary. E.g. is it ok to start
out with a Show that's adequate for debugging, or is it a 'must' to include
instances of
It's just a variant of Data.Map that takes intervals as keys and offers an
efficient stabbing query. I'm reasonably optimistic on the performance
front. Will probably release a 0.1 soon.
Thanks again for all opinions,
Chris
Am 08.12.2011 20:41 schrieb Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com:
On
Hello,
I'm in the process of implementing a container data type, and wonder what
class instances are generally considered necessary. E.g. is it ok to start
out with a Show that's adequate for debugging, or is it a 'must' to include
instances of everything possible (Eq, Ord if possible, Read,
I'd hazard that if you went 'containers' and looked at what instances were
implemented, that would give you a good idea. :^) (For example,
if you look at Data.MAp, it has NFData, Typeable2 and Data instances.)
Edward
Excerpts from Christoph Breitkopf's message of Thu Dec 08 11:12:06 -0500 2011:
That's what I did, and the reason for my question. 'Cause I was scared off
by looking at Data.Map (CPP, lots of language extensions).
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Christoph Breitkopf
chbreitk...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm in the process of implementing a container data type, and wonder what
class instances are generally considered necessary. E.g. is it ok to start
out with a Show that's adequate for debugging, or is it a
Hello Bryan,
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com wrote:
And what about the more experimental things? Say, DeepSeq, Typeable, Data?
None of those are experimental. They're all frequently used in production
code. DeepSeq is far more important than the other
On Thursday 08 December 2011, 18:13:50, Christoph Breitkopf wrote:
Well, including a some file via CPP did look experimental enough to me.
I'd like to stay away from GHC-only code, if possible.
CPP is standard (maybe not in the sense that it's included in the language
standard, but every
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Christoph Breitkopf
chbreitk...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm in the process of implementing a container data type, and wonder what
class instances are generally considered necessary. E.g. is it ok to start
out with a Show that's adequate for debugging, or
