Tillmann Rendel wrote:
Andrew Coppin wrote:
In general, I find *most* search functions to be fairly unhelpful.
Google is the shining exception to this rule; it almost always seems
to figure out what you're after.
I guess doing text searching is just a fundamentally difficult
problem, and
I was reading the 'Problems with do notation' thread and Thomas
Schilling suggested reading about mdo. Not knowing mdo I thought
that sounds interesting and went to
http://haskell.org/
which redirects you to
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haskell
and gives you a search box. Typing mdo and
On 22/11/2007, Richard Kelsall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did I do something wrong when searching haskell.org?
You didn't use Google first? ;-)
Seriously though, using the search box at haskell.org seems to be a
dead loss. I'm sure this has come up in the past.
D.
--
Dougal Stanton
[EMAIL
Hi All
Richard Kelsall wrote:
I was reading the 'Problems with do notation' thread and Thomas
Schilling suggested reading about mdo. Not knowing mdo I thought
that sounds interesting and went to
http://haskell.org/
which redirects you to
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haskell
and
Thomas Schilling wrote:
On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 13:23 +, Richard Kelsall wrote:
I was reading the 'Problems with do notation' thread and Thomas
Schilling suggested reading about mdo. Not knowing mdo I thought
that sounds interesting and went to
Gah, I was too lazy to add the proper
Mads Lindstrøm wrote:
...
Did I do something wrong when searching haskell.org?
Properly not. I think the problem is that haskell.org do not index
words, that have length = 3. MediaWiki (which I think haskell.org uses)
do not by default index short words (length = 3 or length = 4 - can't
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Coppin wrote:
In general, I find *most* search functions to be fairly unhelpful.
Google is the shining exception to this rule; it almost always seems to
figure out what you're after.
I guess doing text searching is just a fundamentally difficult problem,
and the guys at
