Hi all,
I'm using Tagsoup to strip data out of some rather large XML files.
Since the files are large I'm using ByteString, but that leads me
to wonder what is the best way to handle clashes between Prelude
functions like putStrLn and the ByteString versions?
Anyone have any suggestions for
Just import the ByteString module qualified. In other words:
import qualified Data.ByteString as S
or for lazy bytestrings:
import qualified Data.ByteString.Lazy as L
Cheers,
Michael
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo
mle...@mega-nerd.commle%2...@mega-nerd.com
wrote:
Hi
Hi Erik,
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo
mle...@mega-nerd.commle%2...@mega-nerd.com
wrote:
Since the files are large I'm using ByteString, but that leads me
to wonder what is the best way to handle clashes between Prelude
functions like putStrLn and the ByteString
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Erik,
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo
mle...@mega-nerd.commle%2...@mega-nerd.com
wrote:
Since the files are large I'm using ByteString, but that leads me
to wonder what is the best way to
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Michael Snoyman mich...@snoyman.comwrote:
Use qualified imports, like so:
import qualified Data.ByteString as B
main = B.putStrLn $ B.pack test
If you want to pack a String into a ByteString, you'll need to import
Data.ByteString.Char8 instead.
Very
Hi,
Why don't you use the Data.Rope library ?
The asymptotic complexities are way better than those of the ByteString
functions.
PE
El 13/08/2010, a las 07:32, Erik de Castro Lopo escribió:
Hi all,
I'm using Tagsoup to strip data out of some rather large XML files.
Since the files are
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Pierre-Etienne Meunier
pierreetienne.meun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Why don't you use the Data.Rope library ?
The asymptotic complexities are way better than those of the ByteString
functions.
PE
For some operations. I'd expect it to be a constant factor
Pierre-Etienne Meunier wrote:
Hi,
Why don't you use the Data.Rope library ?
The asymptotic complexities are way better than those of the
ByteString functions.
What I see as my current problem is that there is already
a problem having two things Sting and ByteString which
represent strings.
