Hi,
Am Samstag, den 03.12.2011, 16:18 +1100 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo:
I'm working on a literate haskell document (actually TeX, but the
example below is just test) and I'm using ByteStrings in the code.
I know I can do:
ghci -XOverloadedStrings file.lhs
or, after ghci is running I
Joachim Breitner wrote:
it does not seem to be related to literate haskell, if I copy the code
from your file into a .hs without the , ghci still does not activate
the OverloadedStrings extension when loading the file.
I hadn't noticed that.
I’d consider this a bug until the developers
On 3 December 2011 11:19, Erik de Castro Lopo mle...@mega-nerd.com wrote:
Joachim Breitner wrote:
it does not seem to be related to literate haskell, if I copy the code
from your file into a .hs without the , ghci still does not activate
the OverloadedStrings extension when loading the file.
Hi,
I'm working on a literate haskell document (actually TeX, but the
example below is just test) and I'm using ByteStrings in the code.
I know I can do:
ghci -XOverloadedStrings file.lhs
or, after ghci is running I can do:
Main :set -XOverloadedStrings
but I'd like to embed a
On 3 December 2011 16:18, Erik de Castro Lopo mle...@mega-nerd.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on a literate haskell document (actually TeX, but the
example below is just test) and I'm using ByteStrings in the code.
I know I can do:
ghci -XOverloadedStrings file.lhs
or, after ghci is
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
Add :set -XOverloadedStrings to a (possibly local) .ghci file? It
doesn't contain it within the same document, but then if it's a local
one you could also add :load file.lhs in there so that you just have
to type ghci.
Unfortunately, thats no better than telling
