Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2013, 17:47 -0500 schrieb Nehal Patel:
To me, it seems that something like this should be possible -- am i
being naive? does it already exist? have people tried and given up?
is it just around the corner? can you help me make sense of all of
this?
a related
On 2/12/13 5:47 PM, Nehal Patel wrote:
And so my question is, that in 2013, why isn't this process a full fledged part
of the language? I imagine I just don't know what I'm talking about, so correct
me if I'm wrong, but this is how I understand the workflow used in practice
with program
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Nehal Patel nehal.a...@gmail.com wrote:
A few months ago I took the Haskell plunge, and all goes well...
... snip ...
And so my question is, that in 2013, why isn't this process a full fledged
part of the language? I imagine I just don't know what I'm talking
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Nehal Patel nehal.a...@gmail.com wrote:
A few months ago I took the Haskell plunge, and all goes well... -- but I
really want to understand the paradigms as fully as possible, and as it
stands, I find myself with three or four questions for which I've yet to
Rustom Mody rustompm...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Nehal Patel nehal.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Why isn't Program Derivation a first class citizen?
---
I am stating these things from somewhat foggy memory (dont have any
lambda-calculus texts handy) and so will
A few months ago I took the Haskell plunge, and all goes well... -- but I
really want to understand the paradigms as fully as possible, and as it stands,
I find myself with three or four questions for which I've yet to find suitable
answers. I've picked one to ask the cafe -- like my other
To me, it seems that something like this should be possible -- am i being
naive? does it already exist?
During the compilation process GHC optimizes the code by performing successive
transformations of
the program. These transformations are known to preserve meaning of the program
- they
