Op woensdag 01-10-2008 om 18:59 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Jason
Dusek:
Reply to all?
No. Reply-to-list is a different thing. When you reply-to-all to a
person who is in the list, the person gets two copies of the e-mail with
different headers, which messes with filters and replies.
Derek Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
parseCSVFromFile in.csv = return . either (const error!)
Whenever you see this = return . f pattern think liftM or fmap or $.
...and return . f = action is just action . f, no?
-k
--
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 10:15 +0200, Ketil Malde wrote:
Derek Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
parseCSVFromFile in.csv = return . either (const error!)
Whenever you see this = return . f pattern think liftM or fmap or $.
...and return . f = action is just action . f, no?
Well actually
wman wrote:
Long story short, I promised him a one-liner to show the power and
beauty of Haskell.
(writeFile output.csv) = (liftM printCSV $ liftM (map updateLine)
$ parseCSVFromFile input.csv)
Is there room for improvement ?
Um... Does anybody else find it interesting that we are showing
Thats why i put those quotation marks around that part of sequence ;-))
AFAIK one-liners never were about comprehensibility, just about what you can
cram into one line of code.
Any programmer should have no problems guessing what the line does does
(even more so when looking at the final version
On Oct 1, 2008, at 15:51 , Andrew Coppin wrote:
wman wrote:
Long story short, I promised him a one-liner to show the power and
beauty of Haskell.
(writeFile output.csv) = (liftM printCSV $ liftM (map
updateLine) $ parseCSVFromFile input.csv)
Is there room for improvement ?
Um... Does
2008/10/1 wman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PS: Sorry, Andrew, that I first posted the reply directly to you, still
getting used to the fact that gmail kindly replies to the user on whose
behalf the message was sent, not to the list.
I think that's a list setting, not a gmail one.
martin
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Andrew Coppin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Maybe I should start a new tradition where Haskellers have a blob of
Haskell as their sig?
(I can't *wait* to see what the luminaries such as dons, dcoutts and igloo
come up with...)
Some haskell equivalent of :
(writeFile output.csv) = (liftM printCSV $ liftM (map
updateLine) $ parseCSVFromFile input.csv)
Um... Does anybody else find it interesting that we are showing the
beauty of Haskell by attempting to construct the most terse, cryptic,
unmaintainable tangle of point-free code
I don't agree at
Op woensdag 01-10-2008 om 13:25 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Martin
DeMello:
2008/10/1 wman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PS: Sorry, Andrew, that I first posted the reply directly to you, still
getting used to the fact that gmail kindly replies to the user on whose
behalf the message was sent, not
Reply to all?
--
_jsn
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
I got asked how to do one particular thing in excel, which led to discssion
with our local MSOffice expert.
During the discussion I stated that's it too much of a PITA and that I'd
rather write a script.
Long story short, I promised him a one-liner to show the power and beauty
of Haskell.
I got
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, wman wrote:
I got asked how to do one particular thing in excel, which led to discssion
with our local MSOffice expert.
During the discussion I stated that's it too much of a PITA and that I'd
rather write a script.
Long story short, I promised him a one-liner to show the
2008/9/30 wman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I got asked how to do one particular thing in excel, which led to discssion
with our local MSOffice expert.
During the discussion I stated that's it too much of a PITA and that I'd
rather write a script.
Long story short, I promised him a one-liner to show
2008/9/30 wman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I got asked how to do one particular thing in excel, which led to discssion
with our local MSOffice expert.
During the discussion I stated that's it too much of a PITA and that I'd
rather write a script.
Long story short, I promised him a one-liner to show
Something like this perhaps:
writeFile output.csv . printCSV . map updateLine . fromRight =
parseCSVFromFile input.csv
(with fromRight = either (error fromRight :: Left) id or something equivalent)
On 9/30/08, wman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got asked how to do one particular thing in excel,
Thanks a lot, I've had a hunch it was possible to get rid of those those
liftM's. I turned it into:
(writeFile output.csv) . printCSV . (map updateLine) . (either (error
Chyba pri cteni CSV.) id) = parseCSVFromFile input.csv
and am sincerely hoping he will try to decypher it's meaning ;-)))
On
2008/9/30 wman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks a lot, I've had a hunch it was possible to get rid of those those
liftM's. I turned it into:
(writeFile output.csv) . printCSV . (map updateLine) . (either (error
Chyba pri cteni CSV.) id) = parseCSVFromFile input.csv
and am sincerely hoping he will
True, true. And i told myself no-one would notice ;-))
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Graham Fawcett [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
2008/9/30 wman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks a lot, I've had a hunch it was possible to get rid of those those
liftM's. I turned it into:
(writeFile output.csv) .
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, wman wrote:
Thanks a lot, I've had a hunch it was possible to get rid of those those
liftM's. I turned it into:
(writeFile output.csv) . printCSV . (map updateLine) . (either (error Chyba pri cteni CSV.)
id) = parseCSVFromFile input.csv
You may even remove parentheses
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 14:54 -0400, Graham Fawcett wrote:
2008/9/30 wman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I got asked how to do one particular thing in excel, which led to discssion
with our local MSOffice expert.
During the discussion I stated that's it too much of a PITA and that I'd
rather write a
21 matches
Mail list logo
