Re: [Haskell-cafe] don't: a 'do' for comonads?

2006-11-09 Thread Marc A. Ziegert
don't :: a don't = error D'oh! - marc Am Donnerstag, 9. November 2006 04:47 schrieb Donald Bruce Stewart: As seen on #haskell, from an idea by Malcolm, 14:42 ?let top'n'tail = (pre++) . (++/pre) 14:42 lambdabot Defined. 14:43 dons L.top'n'tail foo me now 14:43

Re: [Haskell-cafe] don't: a 'do' for comonads?

2006-11-09 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
hjgtuyl: don't :: whatever - (whatever goes in, nothing comes out) So its: don't :: a - Void ? -- Don ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

[Haskell-cafe] don't: a 'do' for comonads?

2006-11-08 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
As seen on #haskell, from an idea by Malcolm, 14:42 ?let top'n'tail = (pre++) . (++/pre) 14:42 lambdabot Defined. 14:43 dons L.top'n'tail foo me now 14:43 lambdabot prefoo me now/pre 14:43 mauke that reminds me, haskell needs don't 14:43 dons yes! 14:44