On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Kazu Yamamoto k...@iij.ad.jp wrote:
Hello,
vacuum allow that and much more though I don't know if it still works
correctly on GHC 7.4. Anyway your isThunk is
isThunk a = fmap GHC.Vacuum.ClosureType.isThunk GHC.Vacuum.closureType
Great. I confirmed that this
There is also the 'isevaluated' package (which depends on vacuum, but
seems to do something more involved than your code).
Erik
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Chaddaï Fouché chaddai.fou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Kazu Yamamoto k...@iij.ad.jp wrote:
Hello,
Are there
Hi,
Just a word of note: a while back, I decided to take up maintainership
of Vacuum and some associated stuff. In the process of doing this, I
realized that the ClosureType code in vacuum may not accurately model
reality depending on the GHC version. In particular, the definition of
ClosureType
Dear Austin,
Wouldn't it be a good idea to link the Vacuum version-number to the
related ghc version number directly as it's functionality is directly
tied to the ghc version anyway.
vacuum 7.4 for ghc 7.4; vacuum 7.2 for ghc 7.2 aso.
Best regards,
Rico Moorman
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 12:04
On 2 July 2012 20:04, Austin Seipp mad@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just a word of note: a while back, I decided to take up maintainership
of Vacuum and some associated stuff. In the process of doing this, I
realized that the ClosureType code in vacuum may not accurately model
reality depending
Hi Rico,
This is certainly a possibility I have not considered. However, I
still think the Right Way Forward is to ultimately deprecate the
current package as quickly as possible and move its outstanding
functionality into GHC. Vacuum is still undeniably useful for older
GHCs, so I would be
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
If you've taken over maintainership, should we remove it from
haskell-pkg-janitors?
I haven't removed it from haskell-pkg-janitors because I haven't made
a release and the current package points there as the
On 2 July 2012 22:17, Austin Seipp mad@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
If you've taken over maintainership, should we remove it from
haskell-pkg-janitors?
I haven't removed it from haskell-pkg-janitors because I
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm OK with BSD for this. And I understand that copy-pasting
boilerplate could mess things up ;-)
I think I'll change it then, thanks :)
There is a 2999.13.* series of graphviz out, I haven't actually
Hi,
another related package seems to be my ghc-heap-view package, which is a
bit lower level than vaccuum, as it does not try to build a consistent
graph image but rather be more verbose about the heap objects, in
particular about closures referenced by thunks:
Hello,
Are there any ways to see if a value is a thunk or memorized?
I would like to have a function like:
isThunk :: a - IO Bool
I'm implementing some data structures described in Purely Functional
Data Structures and want to check my implementation is correct.
E.g.
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Kazu Yamamoto k...@iij.ad.jp wrote:
Hello,
Are there any ways to see if a value is a thunk or memorized?
I would like to have a function like:
isThunk :: a - IO Bool
vacuum allow that and much more though I don't know if it still works
correctly on GHC 7.4.
Hello,
vacuum allow that and much more though I don't know if it still works
correctly on GHC 7.4. Anyway your isThunk is
isThunk a = fmap GHC.Vacuum.ClosureType.isThunk GHC.Vacuum.closureType
Great. I confirmed that this works with GHC 7.4.
# I removed the a parameter.
Thank you very
13 matches
Mail list logo
