On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 03:12 +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
If you maintain a Haskell package this is for you.
flag splitBase
description: Choose the new smaller, split-up base package.
library
if flag(splitBase)
build-depends: base = 3, containers
else
build-depends: base 3
Splitting of the base package seems to have invalidated the links from
HaskellWiki into the Library documentation.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 11:35:11AM +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
By the way, if you have several common deps it's perfectly ok to factor
them out like this:
Flag splitBase
Description: Choose the new smaller, split-up base package.
Library
Build-Depends: network, HTTP, HTTP-Simple,
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 12:47 +0100, Henning Thielemann wrote:
When Cabal development started I suggested to use Haskell code as
configuration file, because there will be much extensions and the package
description will not fit into a simple syntax soon.
So of course there is a trade-off to be
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Duncan Coutts wrote:
If you maintain a Haskell package this is for you.
So now that GHC 6.8.1 is out you'll want to test your package with it.
We'd especially like maintainers of packages that are distributed on
hackage.haskell.org to test their packages and update them
