vigalchin:
Hello,
Frank mode on ... ;^) In terms of functionality, where is Haskell
superior vs inferior to ML, Caml, OCaml, F#, Erlang, etc.? E.g. in terms
of library functionality?
Without more information, all we can really do is an overview.
There's almost 800
thanks .. ... just trying to get an objective viewpoint and see where the
holes are ...
Vasili
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
vigalchin:
Hello,
Frank mode on ... ;^) In terms of functionality, where is
Haskell
superior vs
2008/9/30 Galchin, Vasili [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
thanks .. ... just trying to get an objective viewpoint and see where the
holes are ...
[...]
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Without more information, all we can really do is an overview.
There's
noteed:
Haskell is growing really fast (in community, libraries and tools). But,
Vasili,
Dons pushes a lot into Arch, so although he gives a correct statement, you
shouldn't build your point of view relying only on that part of his answer
Just rember the number about the Haskell
Hi,
For libraries F# is probably superior to all, as it has libraries for
virtually everything, and can interoperate seamlessly with COM and .NET.
I doubt there will be any library functionality that can't be found or
bought.
Thanks
Neil
--
Hello,
neil.mitchell.2:
Hi,
For libraries F# is probably superior to all, as it has libraries for
virtually everything, and can interoperate seamlessly with COM and .NET.
I doubt there will be any library functionality that can't be found or
bought.
Libraries for monad transformers or comonadic
For libraries F# is probably superior to all, as it has
libraries for
virtually everything, and can interoperate seamlessly with
COM and .NET.
I doubt there will be any library functionality that can't
be found or
bought.
Libraries for monad transformers
I found lots of stuff
ok .. is there a roadmap for Haskell??
Vasili
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
noteed:
Haskell is growing really fast (in community, libraries and tools). But,
Vasili,
Dons pushes a lot into Arch, so although he gives a correct statement,
you
vigalchin:
ok .. is there a roadmap for Haskell??
for the language?
* http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5177116830079185902
for the compiler?
* http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/Releases
for the libraries?
* http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haskell_Platform
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's almost 800 Haskell libraries on hackage.haskell.org (millions of
lines of code). On average, 2 new libraries are released each day
(though 12 new libs were released in the last 24 hours). That's 700 new
libraries a
kr.angelov:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's almost 800 Haskell libraries on hackage.haskell.org (millions of
lines of code). On average, 2 new libraries are released each day
(though 12 new libs were released in the last 24 hours). That's 700
dons:
kr.angelov:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's almost 800 Haskell libraries on hackage.haskell.org (millions of
lines of code). On average, 2 new libraries are released each day
(though 12 new libs were released in the last 24 hours).
for the libraries?
* http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haskell_Platform
You might have mentioned that there is finally a tracker (*) and
an approximate .cabal meta-package (for dependencies only).
- is the programs are not registered by Cabal issue going to be
fixed before platform
claus.reinke:
for the libraries?
* http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haskell_Platform
You might have mentioned that there is finally a tracker (*) and
an approximate .cabal meta-package (for dependencies only).
- is the programs are not registered by Cabal issue going to be
fixed
- is the programs are not registered by Cabal issue going to be
fixed before platform release?
No. Not the right thing for cabal the package system to do.
Huh? Having tool availability out in the open, as updateable packages,
would be more flexible than the current built-in stuff in
Galchin, Vasili ha scritto:
Hello,
Frank mode on ... ;^) In terms of functionality, where is Haskell
superior vs inferior to ML, Caml, OCaml, F#, Erlang, etc.? E.g. in terms
of library functionality?
The advantage of F# is that you get all the .NET framework (but this
leaves me
Don Stewart-2 wrote:
[...]
Haskell was in the nice position
of already having such a process underway,
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haskell_Platform
Hi Don, I'm curious -- what do the images on that page represent? Can you
link to readable versions? Thanks,
Jim
Enjoy!
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 01:55 -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
dons:
kr.angelov:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's almost 800 Haskell libraries on hackage.haskell.org (millions of
lines of code). On average, 2 new libraries are released each day
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 08:40:51 Mitchell, Neil wrote:
Hi,
For libraries F# is probably superior to all, as it has libraries for
virtually everything, and can interoperate seamlessly with COM and .NET.
I doubt there will be any library functionality that can't be found or
bought.
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 11:53:02 Manlio Perillo wrote:
Galchin, Vasili ha scritto:
Hello,
Frank mode on ... ;^) In terms of functionality, where is Haskell
superior vs inferior to ML, Caml, OCaml, F#, Erlang, etc.? E.g. in terms
of library functionality?
The advantage of
On 2008 Sep 30, at 10:25, John Goerzen wrote:
Galchin, Vasili wrote:
Frank mode on ... ;^) In terms of functionality, where is
Haskell
superior vs inferior to ML, Caml, OCaml, F#, Erlang, etc.? E.g. in
terms
of library functionality?
* Two list-like types. Standard list was strict,
side tangent ... I wrote a posix real-time package and it sits now in System
1) I'm sure it can be improved I purposely tried to keep the API close
to the Posix real-time API; however, I am open to suggestions about the
implementation itself and also the API
2) I am looking at changing the
22 matches
Mail list logo
