Conal Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To help me understand your question, would you be unhappy with
the following structure?
-- runnable
main = interact f
-- composable
f = ...
The discipline is to use interact (or another combinator) to
wrap a
A performance improvement could be the caching of responses based on
computation costs and number of accesses. This functionality can be
implemented a general module that may be used to wrap any pure program if
needed. This is something that only pure programs can ever do. And the
haskell type
System.Info is broken. os has the wrong type.
And the wrong value!
I have not installed mingw32 on this machine, mingw32 isn't even an
os...
/me has goal of having os on Linux report wine1.1.7
Thanks
Neil
==
Please
Jules Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Dusek wrote:
Though that seems reasonable, it is not, in general, true.
For example,System.Info.osis generally treated as
pure, though it is not. It's not clear to me how to
disambiguate these born again values from really pure
values.
Hi Jason,
To help me understand your question, would you be unhappy with the following
structure?
-- runnable
main = interact f
-- composable
f = ...
The discipline is to use interact (or another combinator) to wrap a
functional/composable/pure component like f into an
You're essentially describing functional reactive programming. You end
up with the system being described as pure, reactive values and
plugging IO based streams in at the edges.
Have a look at the wiki description
(http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Functional_Reactive_Programming)
and especially
On 2008 Nov 4, at 19:12, Jason Dusek wrote:
Many useful programs that I would like to write in Haskell
don't fall into this category -- for example, network servers
-- but a lot of their components do. Can these components can
be Haskell functions without IO in their signatures?
I'm
Hello Jason,
Wednesday, November 5, 2008, 3:12:29 AM, you wrote:
Many useful programs that I would like to write in Haskell
don't fall into this category -- for example, network servers
-- but a lot of their components do. Can these components can
be Haskell functions without IO in
