Don Stewart d...@galois.com writes:
Some people might be quite excited by Milan's work on significant
performance improvements to the containers package...
Yes, this is great news - both a well written article and an important
piece of work on a cornerstone of the Haskell libraries.
But I am
On 25 June 2010 05:58, Ivan Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
The reason this came up: Thomas Berekneyi wanted to use such classes
for the rewrite of FGL, and when he discussed it on #haskell people
generally indicated that edison was the best out there but was a bit
long in the
Stephen Tetley stephen.tet...@gmail.com writes:
On 25 June 2010 05:58, Ivan Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
The reason this came up: Thomas Berekneyi wanted to use such classes
for the rewrite of FGL, and when he discussed it on #haskell people
generally indicated that edison was
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Ivan Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 June 2010 14:41, David Menendez d...@zednenem.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Ivan Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
As an aside, Alex Mason and I are discussing the possibility of
On 24 June 2010 16:57, Don Stewart d...@galois.com wrote:
Some people might be quite excited by Milan's work on significant
performance improvements to the containers package...
This looks quite nice; good work Milan!!!
As an aside, Alex Mason and I are discussing the possibility of taking
On 24 June 2010 08:08, Ivan Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
As an aside, Alex Mason and I are discussing the possibility of taking
advantage of AusHack *shameless plug* to write some kind of classes
for the different types of containers with a hierarchy. I know about
ListLike,
On 24 June 2010 17:15, Stephen Tetley stephen.tet...@gmail.com wrote:
There are some classes for bulk types in Simon Peyton-Jones's paper
Bulk Types with Class.
Cool, I'll have a look.
Personally, I'll take a lot of convincing that a class approach will
be better than using the module
On 24 June 2010 08:20, Ivan Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
My rational for a class approach is that rather than having your
library spit out a list of values, etc. you let the consumer pick
which data type they prefer (if they're going to be just converting
your list into a Set,
On 24 June 2010 17:55, Stephen Tetley stephen.tet...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 June 2010 08:20, Ivan Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
My rational for a class approach is that rather than having your
library spit out a list of values, etc. you let the consumer pick
which data type they
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:57:54PM -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
Some people might be quite excited by Milan's work on significant
performance improvements to the containers package...
Ah. This all looks excellent! Currently jhc spends about 30-40% of its
time in the containers package according to
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Ivan Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
As an aside, Alex Mason and I are discussing the possibility of taking
advantage of AusHack *shameless plug* to write some kind of classes
for the different types of containers with a hierarchy. I know about
On 25 June 2010 14:41, David Menendez d...@zednenem.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Ivan Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
As an aside, Alex Mason and I are discussing the possibility of taking
advantage of AusHack *shameless plug* to write some kind of classes
for the
12 matches
Mail list logo
