On 2 August 2010 16:24, Jean-Philippe Bernardy berna...@chalmers.se wrote:
Can you explain why you could not use the parsec name,
with revision number (say) 2.2?
This would help improve hackage/cabal/... versioning mechanism.
I think the idea is to give it more prominence: if you go to
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Ivan Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 August 2010 16:24, Jean-Philippe Bernardy berna...@chalmers.se wrote:
Can you explain why you could not use the parsec name,
with revision number (say) 2.2?
This would help improve hackage/cabal/...
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Antoine Latter aslat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Ivan Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote:
That said, if parsec2 is only a bug-fix branch of parsec-2.x, is there
any particular reason work couldn't be done to improve the
