Henning Thielemann wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Dougal Stanton wrote:
On 13/11/2007, Henning Thielemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Dougal Stanton wrote:
-- int a = 3;
-- int *pa = a;
ampersand :: t - Pointer t
ampersand a = Just a
What's bad about using 'ampersand'
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Jules Bean wrote:
Henning Thielemann wrote:
No problem, write a function like 'maybe' to inspect the data.
Instead of 'f m' with
f :: Maybe T - S
f (Just x) = g x
f Nothing = h
Yes. It is a problem.
Do you write all your code using higher-order functions,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Dougal Stanton wrote:
-- int a = 3;
-- int *pa = a;
ampersand :: t - Pointer t
ampersand a = Just a
What's bad about using 'ampersand' function as replacement for the
constructor 'Just'?
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
On 13/11/2007, Henning Thielemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Dougal Stanton wrote:
-- int a = 3;
-- int *pa = a;
ampersand :: t - Pointer t
ampersand a = Just a
What's bad about using 'ampersand' function as replacement for the
constructor 'Just'?
I also wanted
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:44:30PM +0100, Henning Thielemann wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Dougal Stanton wrote:
-- int a = 3;
-- int *pa = a;
ampersand :: t - Pointer t
ampersand a = Just a
What's bad about using 'ampersand' function as replacement for the
constructor 'Just'?
It
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Dougal Stanton wrote:
On 13/11/2007, Henning Thielemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Dougal Stanton wrote:
-- int a = 3;
-- int *pa = a;
ampersand :: t - Pointer t
ampersand a = Just a
What's bad about using 'ampersand' function as
