On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 01:25:39PM +0100, Patrick Browne wrote:
If there is no model expansion could it be because of the constructor
discipline, which only allows variables, and constructors in the LHS
argument patterns.
Indeed, a variable name as a pattern on the LHS of a function
On 23/08/12, Brent Yorgey byor...@seas.upenn.edu wrote:fun1 returns 8 for all inputs. The fact that fun1's definition usesthe name 'constant' which happens to have the same name as somethingin scope is irrelevant. For example, this is precisely the same as the above:constant :: Intconstant =
On 8/23/12 1:02 PM, Patrick Browne wrote:
I am just not sure whether there is a model expansion from the super-class model
to the subclass model.
If by model expansion from... you mean that there is a
canonical/unique/special mapping from every superclass model to some
subclass model, then
